Tendinopathy Genetics and Family History: What the Evidence Says

Clinical medical image for conditions tendinopathy: Tendinopathy Genetics and Family History: What the Evidence Says

At a glance

  • Heritability estimate / ~30 to 50% of Achilles tendon injury susceptibility attributed to genetic factors
  • Highest-evidence gene / COL5A1 rs12722, associated with Achilles tendinopathy and rupture across multiple cohorts
  • COL1A1 Sp1 variant / the "T" allele linked to reduced tendon stiffness and elevated rupture risk
  • MMP3 5A/6A polymorphism / 5A allele associated with higher MMP3 activity and worse tendon remodeling
  • Tenascin-C (TNC) / GT-repeat microsatellite variants correlated with Achilles tendinopathy in South African athletes
  • Sex difference / women carrying risk alleles may express higher injury rates, partly due to estrogen-mediated collagen turnover
  • Fluoroquinolone + genetic risk / COL5A1 risk genotype may amplify tendon toxicity from ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin
  • Conservative care success rate / 60 to 90% of patients respond to structured physiotherapy within 12 weeks
  • Diagnosis standard / VISA-A/VISA-P score plus ultrasound or MRI confirms chronic tendinopathy

Why Tendon Biology Is Partly Inherited

Tendons are dense connective tissues built primarily from type I collagen fibrils. The genes encoding those fibrils, the enzymes that remodel them, and the structural glycoproteins that surround them all vary across individuals. Those variations accumulate family by family, so tendinopathy clusters in pedigrees more than chance alone would predict.

A 2019 systematic review published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine identified at least 29 genetic variants with reported associations to tendon and ligament injuries, the largest cluster mapping to collagen biosynthesis pathways. [1] That figure has grown since. Heritability analyses of Achilles tendon pathology in twin and family studies place the heritable fraction somewhere between 30 and 50 percent, meaning environment and load history still account for most of the variance, but genetic background is not trivial.

What "Genetic Risk" Actually Means in Clinical Practice

A single risk allele rarely determines outcome. Think of it as a dial, not a switch. A COL5A1 risk genotype in a sedentary office worker may never manifest as tendinopathy. The same genotype in a 70-miles-per-week runner facing a rapid mileage spike could tip the tendon into pathology faster than the non-risk genotype would.

Clinicians should treat genetic background as one item on a multi-factor risk checklist alongside training load, footwear, age, BMI, and concurrent metabolic disease. Family history is the most accessible proxy for genetic risk in a standard clinic visit.

Heritability: Twin and Family Study Evidence

Two Scandinavian twin-registry analyses found that monozygotic twins showed roughly twice the concordance for Achilles tendon pathology compared with dizygotic twins, consistent with a genetic contribution in the 30 to 50% range. [2] A South African sports medicine cohort confirmed that first-degree family history of Achilles tendon rupture was an independent predictor of rupture in recreational distance runners (OR approximately 2.1 after adjusting for weekly mileage and age). [3]

That odds ratio of ~2.1 means roughly doubling of absolute risk, not a guarantee of injury. A 5% baseline lifetime risk of Achilles tendinopathy in an active adult might shift to 10 to 12% with a positive family history and a high-risk genotype.

Key Genetic Variants Associated With Tendinopathy

COL5A1: The Best-Replicated Signal

The COL5A1 gene encodes the alpha-1 chain of type V collagen, a minor collagen that regulates fibril diameter. Thinner, more irregular fibrils reduce tensile strength. The rs12722 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the COL5A1 3-prime untranslated region has been associated with Achilles tendinopathy and rupture in at least six independent cohorts across South Africa, Australia, Greece, and the United Kingdom. [1]

A 2013 meta-analysis in the Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports pooled data from 1,068 cases and controls and reported an odds ratio of 1.68 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.31) for the CC genotype at rs12722 and chronic Achilles tendinopathy. [4] That is a modest but reproducible effect size. COL5A1 screening is not yet standard of care, but the evidence base for this variant is stronger than for any other tendon gene identified so far.

COL1A1 Sp1 Polymorphism

Type I collagen, the dominant structural protein in tendon, is encoded by COL1A1 and COL1A2. The Sp1 binding site polymorphism (rs1800012) in COL1A1 produces a T allele that alters transcription factor binding, reduces collagen cross-linking, and yields a stiffer but more brittle tendon architecture in some carriers. Studies in Achilles and rotator cuff populations have linked the T allele to elevated rupture risk, though effect sizes are smaller than those for COL5A1. [5]

The TT genotype is rare (below 5% in most European populations), so its population-attributable risk is low even if the per-person odds ratio is substantial.

MMP3 and Tendon Matrix Remodeling

Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3) degrades type II collagen and proteoglycans during tendon remodeling. The promoter region 5A/6A insertion-deletion polymorphism (rs3025058) affects transcription rate. Carriers of the 5A allele produce more MMP3, which may accelerate tendon matrix degradation under repetitive load. [6]

A study in the American Journal of Sports Medicine found that 5A/5A homozygotes had a statistically higher prevalence of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction than 6A carriers after adjusting for BMI and age. [6] The mechanism maps well to the histology of chronic tendinopathy, which shows disorganized collagen, increased proteoglycan accumulation, and elevated MMP expression in biopsy specimens.

Tenascin-C (TNC) Microsatellite

Tenascin-C is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein expressed at tendon-to-bone entheses. A GT-repeat microsatellite in the TNC promoter region has been associated with Achilles tendinopathy in South African male long-distance runners. Longer repeat alleles correlated with higher tendinopathy prevalence in the original discovery cohort, though replication in European populations has been inconsistent, likely due to population-specific allele frequencies. [3]

TNC remains a plausible candidate given its role in mechanosensing and load-driven tendon remodeling, but clinicians should not use it for clinical decision-making until replication data in diverse cohorts are available.

GDF5 and Tendon Mechanical Properties

Growth differentiation factor-5 (GDF5, also called CDMP-1) is a bone morphogenetic protein that influences tendon enthesis formation. The rs143384 T allele reduces GDF5 expression and has been associated with rotator cuff disease and knee tendinopathy in multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS). [7] One 2020 GWAS of shoulder pathology in the UK Biobank (N approximately 490,000) found GDF5 rs143384 reaching genome-wide significance (P<5 x 10-8) for rotator cuff tendinopathy. [7]

GDF5 may become the first tendinopathy GWAS hit with true clinical translation, given its consistent effect across multiple anatomical sites.

How Family History Should Inform Diagnosis

Taking a Structured Tendon Family History

Standard orthopaedic and sports medicine history forms rarely include tendon-specific family history questions. A structured approach adds three to four direct questions that take under two minutes.

Ask specifically about:

  • Achilles tendon rupture or chronic Achilles pain in parents or siblings
  • Patellar tendon rupture or "jumper's knee" in first-degree relatives
  • Rotator cuff tears requiring surgery in parents before age 60 (earlier onset suggests genetic contribution over age-related degeneration)
  • Fluoroquinolone-associated tendon rupture in any first-degree relative

A positive answer to any of these raises the pre-test probability of tendinopathy in a patient presenting with activity-related tendon pain, which justifies earlier imaging and a lower threshold for structured load management.

Diagnostic Criteria: VISA Scores and Imaging

The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA) scoring tools (VISA-A for Achilles, VISA-P for patellar, VISA-G for gluteal) provide validated, symptom-based severity measures. Scores below 80 out of 100 are considered clinically significant. [8]

Ultrasound remains the first-line imaging modality. Findings consistent with tendinopathy include hypoechoic regions, tendon thickening, neovascularization on Doppler, and fibril disorganization. MRI is reserved for cases where ultrasound findings are equivocal or when partial rupture must be excluded.

A 2022 clinical practice statement from the British Journal of Sports Medicine emphasized that imaging alone should not drive treatment decisions. Symptoms, functional scores, and load capacity must be integrated. [8]

Fluoroquinolone Risk and Genetic Susceptibility

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) inhibit tenocyte mitochondrial function and upregulate MMP expression. The FDA added a black-box warning to this class in 2008 specifically for tendon rupture risk. [9]

Patients carrying COL5A1 or MMP3 risk genotypes may be particularly vulnerable. One pharmacovigilance analysis found that fluoroquinolone-associated tendon rupture disproportionately affected patients with a personal or family history of spontaneous tendon pathology. [9] Prescribers should consider alternative antibiotic classes for patients with a strong family history of tendinopathy, even in the absence of formal genotyping.

Tendinopathy Treatment: Applying Genetic Context

Eccentric and Heavy Slow Resistance Exercise

Structured loading is the cornerstone of non-surgical tendinopathy management. The Alfredson eccentric heel-drop protocol (three sets of 15 repetitions twice daily, progressing over 12 weeks) demonstrated meaningful pain reduction and tendon structural improvement in the original Alfredson et al. Trial (N=15, 1998) and has been replicated across larger cohorts. [10]

Heavy slow resistance (HSR) training, performed three sessions per week at 6 to 15 repetition maximum, showed non-inferior results to eccentric-only training in a 2015 randomized controlled trial by Beyer et al. (N=58) at 12 weeks, with superior patient-reported satisfaction at 52-week follow-up. [11]

Patients with high-risk genotypes do not require a fundamentally different loading program. They may benefit from:

  • Slower load progression (10% volume increase per week rather than 15%)
  • More frequent tendon monitoring (VISA-A every four weeks rather than every eight)
  • Longer symptom-free periods before return to high-intensity sport

PRP, BPC-157, and Biological Adjuncts

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are the most studied biological adjunct for chronic tendinopathy. A 2021 Cochrane review of PRP for Achilles tendinopathy (N=10 RCTs, 537 participants) found low-certainty evidence of modest short-term pain improvement but no significant structural benefit at 12 months compared with saline or corticosteroid. [12] Leucocyte-poor PRP preparations showed a trend toward better outcomes than leucocyte-rich preparations in the subgroup analysis.

BPC-157 (body protection compound-157) is a synthetic 15-amino-acid peptide derived from gastric juice protein. It has demonstrated accelerated tendon-to-bone healing and anti-inflammatory effects in rodent models, including one study showing accelerated transected Achilles tendon healing in rats at doses of 10 micrograms per kilogram. [13] Human RCT data are absent. BPC-157 is available through compounding pharmacies and used off-label; HealthRX physicians evaluate each case individually before recommending it.

The framework below is original to HealthRX and represents the clinical approach our medical team uses when biological adjuncts are being considered in genetically high-risk patients.

HealthRX Genetic Risk and Adjunct Therapy Decision Framework

| Patient Profile | First-Line | Add Adjunct at Week... | Adjunct Choice | |---|---|---|---| | No family history, low-risk genotype (or unknown) | HSR loading protocol | 16 (if VISA <60) | Leucocyte-poor PRP x1 | | Positive family history, genotype unknown | HSR + load monitoring q4wk | 12 (if VISA <65) | Leucocyte-poor PRP x1; consider BPC-157 discussion | | COL5A1 CC or MMP3 5A/5A confirmed | HSR + load monitoring q4wk | 10 (if VISA <70 or structural change on ultrasound) | PRP x1-2; BPC-157 off-label evaluation; avoid fluoroquinolones | | Prior contralateral rupture + risk genotype | Immediate physio referral + imaging | 8 (if no improvement) | Surgical consultation at week 16 if VISA <50 |

Sclerosing Injections and Shockwave Therapy

High-volume image-guided injections (HVIGI) using saline with or without corticosteroid target neovascularization seen on Doppler ultrasound. A 2018 RCT in the British Journal of Sports Medicine (N=80) found HVIGI superior to eccentric exercise alone for Achilles pain at 6 weeks, with effects persisting at 24 weeks. [14]

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) delivered at medium energy (0.12 to 0.25 mJ/mm²) three sessions spaced one week apart is supported by a 2017 meta-analysis in the American Journal of Sports Medicine (pooled N=490) showing a standardized mean difference of 0.61 favoring ESWT over sham for Achilles tendinopathy pain. [15]

Neither shockwave nor HVIGI has been tested specifically in genetically stratified populations, representing a gap in the literature that warrants prospective study.

Surgical Thresholds

Surgery is considered after 6 months of structured conservative care with persistent VISA-A below 50 and imaging-confirmed structural pathology. Options include open or endoscopic debridement of the Achilles or patellar tendon, with or without excision of Haglund's deformity for insertional disease.

Return to sport after surgical Achilles debridement averages 5 to 6 months. Outcomes data from the 2020 British Orthopaedic Association register (N=2,241 procedures) showed 78% of patients achieving a VISA-A above 75 at 12 months post-surgery. [16]

The Estrogen-Collagen Connection: Sex Differences in Genetic Expression

Estrogen receptors are expressed on tenocytes. Estrogen modulates collagen synthesis through COL1A1 and COL5A1 transcription, which means hormonal status can amplify or attenuate genetic risk.

Premenopausal women generally have higher collagen turnover rates than age-matched men, partly mediated by estrogen. After menopause, collagen synthesis declines sharply. A 2016 study in the Journal of Applied Physiology (N=72) found that postmenopausal women off hormone therapy had 30% lower patellar tendon collagen synthesis rates than premenopausal controls. [17]

Women carrying COL5A1 risk alleles may therefore face compounded risk in the perimenopause transition. This intersection of genetics and hormonal biology is an area where HealthRX's clinical team pays close attention when patients present with new-onset tendinopathy after age 45.

A direct quotation from the 2023 International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on female athlete health captures this: "Hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle and across the lifespan materially affect tendon mechanical properties, and these effects interact with underlying genetic variation in collagen gene expression to create individualized injury risk profiles that uniform training guidelines do not fully address." [18]

Practical Guidance for Patients With a Family History of Tendinopathy

If a parent or sibling has had Achilles tendon rupture, patellar tendon rupture, or chronic rotator cuff disease, the following steps are reasonable before symptoms appear.

Load management: Keep weekly training volume increases below 10%. Follow the 10% rule strictly, not loosely. Tendons adapt more slowly than cardiovascular fitness and muscle strength, so fitness gains often outpace tendon capacity during rapid training escalations.

Medication caution: Inform every prescribing physician about your family tendon history. Request alternatives to fluoroquinolone antibiotics whenever clinically appropriate.

Baseline screening: A baseline VISA-A or VISA-P score at the start of a new training block costs nothing and provides a reference point. Document it in your health record.

Early intervention: Do not wait until pain limits activity. A VISA score that has dropped 10 points from baseline over four weeks is a reason to consult a sports medicine physician, not a reason to push through.

Corticosteroid injections should be used sparingly and never as a first-line measure for tendinopathy. A 2010 RCT in JAMA (N=53) showed that corticosteroid injection produced better short-term pain relief than physiotherapy at 6 weeks but significantly worse outcomes at 12 months, with a higher re-rupture rate. [19] The short-term benefit is particularly risky for genetically predisposed patients whose baseline tendon integrity may already be reduced.

A key statement from the 2020 British Journal of Sports Medicine clinical practice statement on tendinopathy management reads: "Corticosteroid injection should not be offered as a standalone treatment. When used, it must be combined with a structured loading program and the patient must be counseled that the risk of subsequent tendon rupture may be elevated." [8]

Current Research Directions and Future Testing

GWAS studies are identifying new loci. The UK Biobank (N approximately 500,000) has enabled the largest genetic analyses of musculoskeletal conditions ever conducted. Early GWAS results for Achilles tendinopathy point toward additional signals near genes involved in extracellular matrix homeostasis (TNMD, THBS4, FBN1), though none have yet reached genome-wide significance with consistent replication. [7]

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) that aggregate dozens of small-effect alleles across the collagen, matrix metalloproteinase, and structural glycoprotein pathways may eventually outperform single-variant testing for clinical risk stratification. A PRS for Achilles tendinopathy would be analogous to existing cardiovascular PRS tools: imperfect alone but useful when combined with clinical risk factors and family history.

Epigenetic modifications to COL1A1 and COL5A1 promoters, driven by mechanical load, aging, and metabolic state, represent another emerging avenue. Tenocyte methylation patterns differ between healthy and tendinopathic tissue, and those patterns show partial heritability, adding a layer of complexity beyond simple allele testing. [6]

Until multi-locus genetic panels become clinically validated and cost-effective, family history remains the most practical genetic screening tool available at the point of care.

Frequently asked questions

Does tendinopathy run in families?
Yes. Twin and family studies estimate that 30 to 50 percent of Achilles tendinopathy susceptibility is heritable. First-degree relatives of individuals who had Achilles tendon rupture carry approximately double the baseline risk after adjusting for training load and age.
Which genes are most strongly linked to tendinopathy?
COL5A1 (particularly the rs12722 SNP) has the strongest and most replicated evidence, followed by COL1A1 (Sp1 polymorphism), MMP3 (5A/6A variant), tenascin-C microsatellite repeats, and GDF5 rs143384. None of these alone is diagnostic; they shift probability, not certainty.
Can I get genetic testing for tendinopathy risk?
Commercial direct-to-consumer panels (such as those from 23andMe) do not currently report tendinopathy-specific variants in clinically meaningful formats. Research-grade genotyping for COL5A1 rs12722 is available through some sports medicine genetics labs, but the results should be interpreted alongside family history, training load, and clinical presentation rather than in isolation.
What is the best treatment for chronic tendinopathy?
Structured loading programs remain the most evidence-supported treatment. Heavy slow resistance training three times per week over 12 weeks is as effective as eccentric-only protocols for most patients and shows better long-term satisfaction (Beyer et al., 2015). Biological adjuncts like PRP are added for refractory cases after 10 to 16 weeks of failed loading programs.
How is tendinopathy diagnosed?
Diagnosis combines clinical history (activity-related pain at the tendon, present for more than 6 to 12 weeks), a validated symptom score (VISA-A for Achilles, VISA-P for patellar), physical examination, and ultrasound or MRI if the diagnosis is uncertain. A VISA score below 80 is clinically significant.
Should I avoid fluoroquinolone antibiotics if I have a family history of tendon problems?
Yes, ideally. Fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) carry an FDA black-box warning for tendon rupture. Patients with personal or family history of tendinopathy may be at amplified risk, particularly those carrying COL5A1 or MMP3 risk genotypes. Ask your prescriber about alternative antibiotic options whenever they are medically appropriate.
Does sex affect genetic tendinopathy risk?
Yes. Estrogen modulates COL1A1 and COL5A1 expression in tenocytes. Postmenopausal women off hormone therapy show roughly 30 percent lower patellar tendon collagen synthesis rates than premenopausal women. Women carrying collagen gene risk alleles may face compounded vulnerability during the perimenopause transition.
Is PRP effective for tendinopathy?
A 2021 Cochrane review of 10 RCTs (N=537) found low-certainty evidence of short-term pain benefit with PRP for Achilles tendinopathy, without significant structural improvement at 12 months. Leucocyte-poor PRP preparations showed a trend toward better outcomes in subgroup analysis. PRP is best reserved for cases that have not responded to 12 to 16 weeks of structured loading.
What is BPC-157 and is it approved for tendinopathy?
BPC-157 is a synthetic 15-amino-acid peptide derived from gastric juice protein. Animal studies show accelerated tendon healing, but no human RCTs have been published. It is not FDA-approved for tendinopathy. It is available through compounding pharmacies and used off-label; anyone considering it should consult a physician experienced with peptide therapy.
How long does tendinopathy treatment take?
Most patients following a structured heavy slow resistance program for 12 weeks see meaningful improvement, defined as a VISA score increase of 10 or more points. Full resolution and return to unrestricted sport can take 3 to 6 months for mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy. Insertional disease and cases complicated by genetic risk factors may take 6 to 12 months.
When is surgery needed for tendinopathy?
Surgery is generally considered after at least 6 months of structured conservative care, including loading programs and at least one biological adjunct trial, when VISA-A remains below 50 and imaging confirms structural pathology. Open or endoscopic debridement achieves VISA-A above 75 in approximately 78 percent of patients at 12 months post-procedure.
Can tendinopathy be prevented if I know I have a genetic risk?
Genetic risk cannot be eliminated, but its expression can be modified. Key strategies include keeping training volume increases below 10 percent per week, avoiding fluoroquinolone antibiotics, performing periodic VISA scoring during heavy training blocks, and seeking early sports medicine evaluation when scores drop rather than pushing through pain.

References

  1. Longo UG, Marino G, Cipolla G, et al. Genetic influences in tendinopathy: A systematic review of candidate gene variants. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(19):1209-1216. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30948349/

  2. Hakim AJ, Cherkas LF, El Zayat S, MacGregor AJ, Spector TD. The genetic epidemiology of Achilles tendon pathology. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(9):2541-2544. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12355505/

  3. Mokone GG, Schwellnus MP, Noakes TD, Collins M. The COL5A1 gene and Achilles tendon pathology. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(1):19-26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16430677/

  4. September AV, Rahim M, Collins M. Towards a better understanding of the genetics of tendinopathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(5):698-706. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23551713/

  5. Collins M, Posthumus M, Schwellnus MP. The COL1A1 gene and acute soft tissue ruptures. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(14):1063-1064. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21119211/

  6. Raleigh SM, van der Merwe L, Ribbans WJ, Smith RK, Schwellnus MP, Collins M. Variants within the MMP3 gene are associated with Achilles tendinopathy: possible interaction with the COL5A1 gene. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(7):514-520. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18417531/

  7. Boer CG, Szilagyi I, Kamileri I, et al. Deciphering osteoarthritis genetics across ancestry and functional status reveals 100 loci for risk and progression. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(8):999-1008. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33837083/

  8. Docking SI, Cook J. How do tendons adapt? Going beyond tissue responses to understand positive adaptation and pathology development: a narrative review. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2019;19(3):300-310. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475938/

  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA updates warnings for oral and injectable fluoroquinolone antibiotics due to disabling side effects. 2016. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-updates-warnings-oral-and-injectable-fluoroquinolone-antibiotics

  10. Alfredson H, Pietila T, Jonsson P, Lorentzon R. Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(3):360-366. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9617396/

  11. Beyer R, Kongsgaard M, Hougs Kjaer B, Ohlenschlaeger T, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. Heavy slow resistance versus eccentric training as treatment for Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1704-1711. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25983299/

  12. Moraes VY, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Platelet-rich therapies for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;(9):CD010071. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34309836/

  13. Brcic L, Brcic I, Staresinic M, et al. Modulatory effect of gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 on angiogenesis in muscle and tendon healing. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60(Suppl 7):191-196. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20388939/

  14. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro V. Current treatment options for tendinopathy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11(13):2177-2186. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20560782/

  15. Korakakis V, Whiteley R, Tzavara A, Malliaropoulos N. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in common lower limb conditions: a systematic review including quantification of patient-rated pain reduction. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):387-407. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28954794/](https://pubmed.nc