CJC-1295 Compounding Pharmacy FDA and State Board Enforcement History

At a glance

  • FDA approval / None; no approved product contains any form of CJC-1295 in the countries FDA searched [2]
  • Advisory committee, 4 Dec 2024 / Free base 0 yes, 13 no; acetate 1 yes, 12 no; each DAC form 0 yes, 13 no [1]
  • Bulks lists / In none of the three categories for state-licensed pharmacies; absent from the outsourcing-facility list [3][4]
  • Category 1 no-action policy / Does not apply: no approved drug contains it and it has no USP monograph [3][4]
  • Safety-risk list / Moved to the nominated-but-withdrawn table; FDA's stated concerns remain posted [5]
  • HHS October 2026 peptide policy / Covers six other peptides, not CJC-1295 [6]

What FDA did with CJC-1295

FDA's reviewers proposed in December 2024 that none of the CJC-1295 forms be added to the pharmacy bulks list [1]. On 4 December 2024 the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee voted 0 yes and 13 no on CJC-1295 free base, 1 yes and 12 no on CJC-1295 acetate, and 0 yes and 13 no on each of the three DAC forms [1].

CJC-1295 falls into none of the three categories on FDA's list for state-licensed pharmacies and physicians (updated 14 May 2026) and is absent from the list for outsourcing facilities (updated 21 March 2025) [3][4]. It is not a component of an FDA-approved drug and has no USP monograph, so FDA's category 1 policy, which generally means no action against compounders that meet its conditions, does not reach it [3][4].

Where the safety concerns come from

CJC-1295 was previously in category 2, the group FDA flags as presenting significant safety risks. It now sits in the nominated-but-withdrawn table because the nominators withdrew, while FDA's stated concerns remain posted: possible immunogenicity for certain routes, impurity and characterization problems, serious adverse events including increased heart rate and systemic vasodilatory reaction, and limited clinical data [5].

ConjuChem, the Montreal company that developed the peptide, withdrew the DAC form from clinical trials in 2006 after a participant in a phase 2 trial in HIV lipodystrophy (192 enrolled) died [2]. FDA cited anecdotal news reports that the participant had chest discomfort two hours after an 11th weekly dose and that an ECG showed an acute heart attack; the attending physician's most likely explanation was undiagnosed coronary artery disease with plaque rupture [2]. The data were never published, so a causal link is neither shown nor excluded [2].

FDA identified three published human studies, all of the DAC form and all in healthy volunteers, and found none in people with a disease [2]. It noted that raising growth hormone and IGF-I carries the risks listed on approved growth hormone labels, including glucose intolerance and diabetes [2]. CJC-1295 sold online is mostly labeled research use only, including blends with ipamorelin and GHRPs, and the peptide has appeared in illicit sports use; research-use-only products are not FDA-approved drugs [2].

State-licensed pharmacies

CJC-1295 appears in none of the three categories on FDA's list for state-licensed pharmacies and physicians, and it sits outside the category 1 no-action policy [3][4]. No FDA or HHS action allowing compounding of CJC-1295 has been found, and the October 2026 HHS draft policy does not name it [6].

Frequently asked questions

What did the advisory committee vote on CJC-1295?
On 4 December 2024 the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee voted 0 yes and 13 no on CJC-1295 free base, 1 yes and 12 no on the acetate, and 0 yes and 13 no on each of the three DAC forms. FDA reviewers had proposed that none be added to the pharmacy bulks list [1].
Was that vote an enforcement action against a pharmacy?
No. The December 2024 advisory committee vote concerned whether to add CJC-1295 to the pharmacy bulks list; it was not an enforcement action against a pharmacy [1].
Is CJC-1295 on FDA's category 2 safety risk list right now?
Not currently. It was in category 2 but now sits in the nominated-but-withdrawn table because the nominators withdrew. FDA's concerns remain posted, including possible immunogenicity for certain routes, impurity and characterization problems, serious adverse events, and limited clinical data [5].
Does the October 2026 HHS peptide policy cover CJC-1295?
No. The draft enforcement-discretion policy names BPC-157, epitalon, KPV, MOTS-c, Semax and TB-500 only [6].

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  5. Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding that May Present Significant Safety Risks | FDA. Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding that May Present Significant Safety Risks | FDA
  6. Official web page. Official web page
Evidence overview for CJC-1295 Compounding Pharmacy FDA and State Board Enforcement History