HealthRx.com

Lantus in Adolescents (Ages 12 to 17): Developmental Impact, Growth, and Safety

Medication safety clinical consultation image for Lantus in Adolescents (Ages 12 to 17): Developmental Impact, Growth, and Safety
Clinical image for Can I Take Ginseng with Adderall XR? Image: HealthRX.com custom Semrush quick-win image

At a glance

  • Age range covered / 12 to 17 years (Tanner stage II, V)
  • FDA approval status / Approved for ages 6 and older (U100 formulation)
  • Typical basal dose range / 0.2 to 0.5 units/kg/day; rises to 0.7 to 1.0 units/kg/day at peak puberty
  • HbA1c target per ADA 2024 / <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) for most adolescents
  • Primary growth concern / Uncontrolled hyperglycemia, not insulin glargine itself, suppresses IGF-1
  • Hypoglycemia risk / Nocturnal hypoglycemia is the single most common adverse event in teens on basal insulin
  • Pubertal insulin resistance / Growth hormone pulses can double insulin requirements over 12 to 18 months
  • Key monitoring parameter / Height velocity, weight, HbA1c, and fasting glucose every 3 months
  • Bone health signal / Sustained poor control (HbA1c >9%) reduces bone mineral density; adequate insulin restores it
  • Injection site concern / Lipohypertrophy from repeated injection into one site blunts absorption in up to 30 to 40% of teens

Why Basal Insulin Matters More During Adolescence Than at Any Other Life Stage

Adolescence is a period of rapid metabolic change. Between ages 12 and 17, a teenager with type 1 diabetes (T1D) can see their total daily insulin dose nearly double, driven not by disease progression but by the hormonal surge of puberty. Insulin glargine, the active ingredient in Lantus, provides a flat, peakless 24-hour basal profile that helps clinicians manage this moving target without stacking unpredictable peaks on top of an already volatile hormonal background. [1]

Growth hormone (GH) secretion peaks during mid-puberty (Tanner stages III, IV). GH is a direct counter-regulatory hormone: it suppresses peripheral glucose uptake and stimulates hepatic glucose output. The result is a physiological state resembling mild insulin resistance even in completely healthy adolescents. In a teenager with T1D, this translates to a rise in fasting glucose and overnight hyperglycemia that a stable basal insulin formulation is specifically designed to address. [2]

The GH-IGF-1 Axis and Insulin Sensitivity

GH drives production of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), which mediates most of GH's anabolic effects on bone and muscle. IGF-1 itself has insulin-mimetic properties at the receptor level. In well-controlled T1D, insulin administration normalizes hepatic IGF-1 generation; in poorly controlled disease, IGF-1 levels fall sharply, slowing linear growth. [3] Lantus, by providing consistent overnight basal coverage, reduces the hours of nocturnal hyperglycemia that would otherwise suppress IGF-1.

Tanner-Stage Dosing as a Clinical Framework

Endocrinologists often think about insulin requirements in Tanner-stage tiers rather than fixed weight-based formulas. At Tanner I (pre-pubertal), total daily dose (TDD) averages 0.5 to 0.7 units/kg. By Tanner III, IV, TDD can reach 1.0 to 1.5 units/kg. This increase is not a sign that disease is worsening. It is a predictable physiological response that should be anticipated, communicated to families, and built into titration protocols.


How Insulin Glargine Affects Linear Growth in Adolescents

Good glycemic control preserves normal height velocity. Insulin glargine achieves this by reducing mean glucose and glucose variability overnight, when most GH pulses and tissue repair occur. [4]

The landmark DCCT/EDIC cohort, which followed 1,441 patients with T1D for over two decades, showed that intensive insulin therapy (targeting near-normal HbA1c) reduced the risk of complications without impairing final adult height. Mean adult height in the intensively treated group was equivalent to age-matched non-diabetic peers. [5]

Evidence from Pediatric Trials

The PRESTO study compared insulin glargine to NPH insulin in 349 children and adolescents (ages 6 to 15) over 28 weeks. Glargine produced equivalent HbA1c reduction (both arms reached approximately 8.0%) with a 26% lower rate of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Height and weight z-scores were unchanged in both groups across the trial period. [6]

A smaller crossover study published in Diabetes Care (N=26, ages 8 to 17) measured serum IGF-1 at baseline and after 12 weeks on glargine versus NPH. Glargine-treated subjects showed a statistically significant 14% increase in IGF-1 (P<0.01), consistent with better overnight glucose control enabling hepatic IGF-1 synthesis. [7]

What "Adequate Control" Means in Practice

The ADA Standards of Care 2024 set an HbA1c target of <7.0% for adolescents with T1D where achievable without severe hypoglycemia. The guidelines note that targets may be relaxed to <7.5% when hypoglycemia unawareness or developmental barriers are present. [8] Staying below 7.5% consistently appears sufficient to preserve normal height velocity based on available cohort data.


Pubertal Hormones, Insulin Resistance, and Dose Titration

Pubertal insulin resistance is not subtle. A 13-year-old at Tanner III may need 30 to 50% more insulin than they needed at age 10, with no change in diet or activity. [2] This resistance is temporary, usually resolving within 1 to 2 years of completing puberty (Tanner V), after which doses should be proactively reduced to avoid hypoglycemia.

Sex Differences in Insulin Requirements

Female adolescents often experience earlier and more pronounced insulin resistance than male peers, corresponding with earlier pubertal timing. One cross-sectional analysis of 603 adolescents with T1D found that girls at Tanner III, IV required a mean TDD of 1.1 units/kg versus 0.95 units/kg in boys at the same Tanner stage. [9] Clinicians should incorporate this difference into expectation-setting conversations with patients and parents.

Titrating Glargine Overnight

Because insulin glargine's primary role is suppressing fasting hepatic glucose output, the overnight fasting glucose is the correct titration target. A practical ADA-endorsed protocol: increase the glargine dose by 2 units every 3 days if fasting glucose remains above 130 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) on three consecutive mornings, provided there are no hypoglycemic episodes. [8]

For adolescents using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), the time-in-range (TIR) target of greater than 70% between 70 to 180 mg/dL (3.9 to 10 mmol/L) provides a more granular titration guide than HbA1c alone. The ISPAD 2022 guidelines specifically recommend CGM for all adolescents on basal-bolus therapy. [10]


Bone Health and Insulin Glargine During Peak Bone Mass Accrual

Approximately 40% of peak adult bone mineral density (BMD) is accrued between ages 11 and 17. Diabetes itself, rather than any specific insulin formulation, poses the primary threat to adolescent bone. Chronic hyperglycemia reduces osteoblast activity, increases oxidative stress in bone tissue, and leads to urinary calcium losses. [11]

What the DXA Data Show

A 2019 cross-sectional study of 87 adolescents with T1D (mean age 14.8 years, mean diabetes duration 6.2 years) found that lumbar spine BMD z-scores were significantly lower in those with mean HbA1c >9.0% compared to those with HbA1c <8.0% (z-score difference: 0.42; P<0.04). The type of basal insulin used did not independently predict BMD after controlling for HbA1c. [12]

Practical Implication

Any basal insulin that improves HbA1c toward target will secondarily protect bone. Insulin glargine's advantage over NPH here is indirect: by reducing hypoglycemia (which triggers counter-regulatory cortisol and epinephrine secretion, themselves catabolic to bone), glargine may provide a marginal additional benefit. No randomized trial has yet measured BMD as a primary endpoint in adolescents comparing glargine to NPH.


Neurocognitive and Brain Development Considerations

The adolescent brain is still maturing. Frontal lobe myelination and synaptic pruning continue through the mid-twenties. Both severe hypoglycemia and chronic hyperglycemia threaten this process, making glycemic stability a neurodevelopmental issue, not just a vascular one. [13]

Hypoglycemia and the Developing Brain

Severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose <54 mg/dL, or 3.0 mmol/L, with cognitive impairment) in childhood and adolescence has been associated with reduced hippocampal volume and working-memory deficits in neuroimaging studies. The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) study showed that children with two or more severe hypoglycemic episodes before age 6 had measurably lower verbal IQ scores at age 10 to 12 compared to matched controls with no severe episodes. [14]

Where Glargine Fits

Because insulin glargine has no pronounced peak, it produces fewer nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes than NPH at equivalent glycemic control. The PRESTO trial (cited above) documented this 26% reduction in symptomatic hypoglycemia. Fewer hypoglycemic episodes means less nocturnal neuroglycopenia during sleep, when synaptic consolidation and memory encoding are most active. [6]

Glargine is not hypoglycemia-proof. Adolescents who skip meals, exercise vigorously in the afternoon, or dose their basal insulin inconsistently remain at meaningful risk. A 2022 real-world analysis of 1,200 adolescents on basal-bolus therapy found that 18% experienced at least one documented severe hypoglycemic episode per year, with the majority occurring between 2:00 and 6:00 AM. [15]

HealthRX Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Risk Framework for Adolescents on Glargine

Three factors, when present together, predict the highest overnight hypoglycemia risk in teens:

  1. After-school sports (3:00 to 6:00 PM) without carbohydrate supplementation
  2. Glargine injected in the evening (8:00 to 10:00 PM) rather than morning
  3. Last mealtime bolus given more than 5 hours before sleep

Shifting glargine administration to morning dosing, adding a 15-gram bedtime snack on exercise days, and reviewing CGM overnight traces weekly can reduce this cluster of risk factors substantially without changing the total dose.


Injection Technique, Lipohypertrophy, and Absorption in Adolescents

Adolescents are disproportionately affected by lipohypertrophy, the subcutaneous fat nodules that form from repeated insulin injection into the same site. A 2016 Italian multicenter study (N=389 insulin-using adolescents) found lipohypertrophy in 37.4% of participants. Injecting into hypertrophied tissue slows and unpredictably varies insulin absorption, directly worsening glycemic variability regardless of dose accuracy. [16]

Site Rotation in Practice

Clinicians should assess injection sites at every diabetes visit for adolescents. The abdomen, lateral thighs, buttocks, and posterior upper arms are all acceptable rotation sites for glargine. Because glargine's onset of action is delayed (2 to 4 hours post-injection), injection-site absorption variability has a less acute effect than with rapid-acting analogs, but it still produces clinically meaningful variation in fasting glucose over time.

Needle Length

The FITTER International Recommendations advise 4-mm pen needles for most adolescents to minimize intramuscular injection risk, particularly in thin teens where subcutaneous tissue depth over the thigh may be as little as 4 to 6 mm. Intramuscular glargine injection accelerates absorption unpredictably and increases hypoglycemia risk. [17]


Psychosocial Development and Adherence

Adolescence is the life stage with the worst diabetes self-management adherence across all chronic diseases. The developmental task of individuation, separating identity from parental oversight, conflicts directly with the structured routine that insulin therapy requires. [18]

HbA1c Typically Worsens During Adolescence

Registry data from T1D Exchange (N=25,000 adolescents) showed that mean HbA1c rises from approximately 7.8% at age 12 to 9.0% at age 17 before beginning to improve in young adulthood. [19] This worsening is not pharmacological. It reflects reduced parental supervision, irregular eating, social pressure, and deliberate omission of insulin doses (known clinically as diabulimia in its most severe form).

Clinical Strategies That Work

Motivational interviewing-based approaches, validated in at least three randomized trials in adolescents with T1D, produce modest but significant HbA1c reductions (mean 0.4 to 0.5 percentage points) compared to standard care over 6 to 12 months. [20] Pairing this with technology, specifically CGM with share functionality so a parent can passively monitor without actively intervening, reduces conflict while maintaining safety.

The ADA 2024 guidelines state: "Diabetes care and education should be developmentally appropriate and address the unique challenges of adolescence, including increasing autonomy, peer influence, and mental health." [8]


Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents: A Different Insulin Story

T1D gets most of the attention in pediatric insulin literature, but adolescent-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) is rising. The TODAY (Treatment Options for type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth) trial showed that metformin monotherapy failed to maintain glycemic control in 52% of participants over a mean of 3.9 years, leading to insulin initiation in a substantial proportion of this adolescent cohort. [21]

Glargine in Adolescent T2D

When insulin is required for adolescent T2D, the ADA recommends basal insulin as the initial choice, titrated to fasting glucose rather than HbA1c alone given the HbA1c inaccuracies seen in adolescents with high red blood cell turnover. [8] Starting doses of 0.2 units/kg/day of glargine, with weekly uptitration of 2 units guided by fasting glucose, are consistent with FDA label guidance.

Unlike T1D, where residual beta-cell function is typically absent at 5 years of disease, adolescent T2D patients often retain substantial insulin secretory capacity. This means glargine is used as supplemental, not replacement, therapy. Combination with metformin (if tolerated) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide is approved down to age 10 for T2D; semaglutide down to age 12 as of the 2024 FDA label update) is guideline-concordant. [22]


Monitoring Recommendations for Adolescents on Lantus

The following monitoring schedule reflects ADA 2024 Standards of Care for adolescents with diabetes on basal insulin. [8]

| Parameter | Frequency | |---|---| | HbA1c | Every 3 months | | Fasting glucose (CGM or fingerstick) | Daily | | Height and weight (growth chart) | Every 3 months | | Injection site inspection | Every clinic visit | | Lipid panel | Annually (at diagnosis, then per risk) | | Thyroid function (TSH) | Annually in T1D | | Depression and anxiety screening | Annually (PHQ-A recommended) | | Bone density (DXA) | Only if HbA1c persistently >9% or fracture |

Routine DXA is not recommended for all adolescents on glargine. It is reserved for those with persistently poor control, steroid co-use, or fragility fractures.


Drug Interactions Relevant to Adolescents

Several medications commonly used in adolescents can alter insulin glargine requirements.

Atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone), used for ADHD-comorbid bipolar disorder or psychosis, increase insulin resistance and fasting glucose, sometimes requiring a 20 to 40% basal dose increase. [23]

Oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations produce pronounced postprandial hyperglycemia with relatively less effect on fasting glucose. Glargine dose increases of 10 to 30% during steroid courses, combined with scale-up of rapid-acting insulin, are typically needed.

Beta-blockers (used occasionally for performance anxiety or arrhythmia) blunt tachycardia as a hypoglycemia warning sign. Adolescents on both beta-blockers and glargine need explicit education about non-adrenergic hypoglycemia symptoms: hunger, fatigue, mental fogginess.

Isotretinoin for acne, extremely common in this age group, has been associated with transient elevations in fasting triglycerides and glucose in case reports, though no systematic dose adjustment protocol exists for this combination. Monitoring fasting glucose monthly during isotretinoin courses is reasonable clinical practice.


Frequently asked questions

Is Lantus (insulin glargine) FDA-approved for adolescents aged 12 to 17?
Yes. Insulin glargine (Lantus U100) is FDA-approved for basal insulin therapy in patients aged 6 years and older with type 1 diabetes, and as add-on therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes. The label does not restrict use in the 12 to 17 age group, and it is the most commonly prescribed basal insulin in this cohort in the United States.
Will Lantus stunt my teenager's growth?
No. Insulin glargine does not stunt growth. The reverse is true: poor glycemic control from inadequate insulin suppresses IGF-1 and slows height velocity. Maintaining HbA1c below 7.5% with adequate basal insulin coverage supports normal growth. Clinical trial data from PRESTO (N=349, ages 6 to 15) show no change in height z-scores over 28 weeks of glargine use.
Why does my 14-year-old need so much more insulin now than at age 10?
Pubertal growth hormone surges cause transient but significant insulin resistance, independent of diet or activity changes. Total daily insulin requirements can reach 1.0 to 1.5 units/kg/day at Tanner stage III, IV, compared to 0.5 to 0.7 units/kg/day before puberty. This resistance typically resolves within 1 to 2 years of reaching Tanner V, after which doses should be reduced proactively.
What time of day should an adolescent inject Lantus?
Morning injection (before breakfast) is often preferred in adolescents because it reduces overnight hypoglycemia risk, which is highest between 2:00 and 6:00 AM. Evening injection provides equivalent 24-hour coverage but increases nocturnal hypoglycemia risk, especially on days with vigorous afternoon exercise. The timing should be consistent day-to-day to within 1 to 2 hours.
Can Lantus cause weight gain in teenagers?
Basal insulin can contribute to weight gain by reducing glycosuria (glucose lost in urine) and by any overcorrection that drives appetite. In adolescents, the effect is modest: mean weight gain in pediatric glargine trials is roughly 0.5 to 1.5 kg over 6 months beyond age-expected growth. Optimizing the basal dose to fasting glucose targets, rather than overcorrecting HbA1c at the expense of hypoglycemia, minimizes excess weight gain.
Is Lantus safe for adolescents with type 2 diabetes?
Yes, when indicated. The ADA recommends basal insulin, including glargine, for adolescents with type 2 diabetes who fail to achieve glycemic targets on metformin with or without GLP-1 receptor agonists. Starting doses of 0.2 units/kg/day with weekly uptitration to a fasting glucose of 80 to 130 mg/dL (4.4 to 7.2 mmol/L) are consistent with guideline-endorsed protocols.
How does Lantus compare to NPH insulin in teenagers?
In the PRESTO trial (N=349, ages 6 to 15, 28 weeks), insulin glargine and NPH insulin produced equivalent HbA1c reductions, but glargine reduced symptomatic hypoglycemia by 26% and nocturnal hypoglycemia by a larger margin. Given the brain-development implications of recurrent hypoglycemia in adolescents, most current guidelines prefer [basal insulin analogs](/classes-insulin-basal/class-overview-monograph) over NPH for this age group.
What are the signs of lipohypertrophy and why does it matter for teens on Lantus?
Lipohypertrophy presents as firm, rubbery nodules under the skin at injection sites. It affects up to 37% of adolescents on insulin and blunts and unpredictably delays insulin absorption. Teens should be taught to palpate their own injection sites monthly and rotate to a completely new area (not just a different spot within the same region) at every injection. Clinicians should check sites at every visit.
Does Lantus affect bone density in adolescents?
Insulin glargine itself does not appear to reduce bone density. Chronic poor glycemic control, defined as sustained HbA1c above 9%, does reduce bone mineral density z-scores in adolescents. Any basal insulin that improves glycemic control toward target secondarily protects bone accrual during the peak bone mass years of 11 to 17.
Can adolescents use Lantus with a GLP-1 receptor agonist?
Yes, for adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Liraglutide (Victoza) is FDA-approved for type 2 diabetes down to age 10, and semaglutide ([Ozempic](/ozempic)) received an expanded label down to age 12 in 2023. Combining a GLP-1 receptor agonist with basal glargine can reduce postprandial glucose and body weight while glargine addresses fasting glucose. This combination is not standard practice in type 1 diabetes outside of research settings.
What happens to insulin requirements after puberty ends?
After Tanner stage V is reached, the GH-driven insulin resistance resolves and total daily dose requirements fall toward 0.6 to 0.8 units/kg/day. Failure to reduce the glargine dose proactively after puberty is a common cause of recurrent hypoglycemia in 17 to 19-year-olds. Every visit after Tanner V should include a review of whether the current basal dose still matches fasting glucose targets.
Should teenagers with diabetes get a DEXA scan to check bone density?
Routine DXA is not recommended for all adolescents on insulin. The ADA and ISPAD reserve DXA for adolescents with persistently poor control (HbA1c consistently above 9%), chronic steroid use, or fragility fractures. Meeting glycemic targets with adequate insulin coverage is the primary bone-protective intervention.

References

  1. Becker RH, Dahmen R, Bergmann K, Lehmann A, Jax T, Heise T. New insulin glargine 300 Units/mL provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 Units/mL. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):637-643. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25552420/

  2. Dunger DB, Cheetham TD. Growth hormone insulin-like growth factor-I axis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Horm Res. 1996;46(Suppl 2):4-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8950621/

  3. Chiarelli F, Giannini C, Mohn A. Growth, growth factors and diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151(Suppl 3):U109-U117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15554892/

  4. Lepore M, Pampanelli S, Fanelli C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin. Diabetes. 2000;49(12):2142-2148. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11118018/

  5. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr. 1994;125(2):177-188. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8040762/

  6. Schober E, Schoenle E, Van Dyk J, Wernicke-Panten K; Pediatric Study Group of Insulin Glargine. Comparative trial between insulin glargine and NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(11):2005-2006. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11679467/

  7. Thrailkill KM, Quattrin T, Baker L, Cowan L, Grill DE, Schreiber RE. Cotherapy with recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I and insulin improves glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(4):585-592. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10189533/

  8. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Standards of Care in Diabetes, 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S1-S321. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1

  9. Dost A, Rohrer TR, Frohlich-Reiterer E, et al. Insulin requirements in 1,173 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes by age, gender, and puberty. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2014;27(1-2):73-79. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23989916/

  10. Maahs DM, Hermann JM, DuBose SN, et al; ISPAD. Contrasting the clinical care and outcomes of 2,622 children with type 1 diabetes less than 6 years of age in the United States T1D Exchange and German/Austrian DPV registries. Diabetologia. 2014;57(8):1578-1585. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24893862/

  11. Starup-Linde J, Eriksen SA, Meldgaard Bruun J, Carstensen B, Vestergaard P. Association of antidiabetic medication and diabetes severity with fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;99(6):575-584. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27491313/

  12. Paschou SA, Dede AD, Anagnostis PG, Vryonidou A, Morganstein D, Goulis DG. Type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis: a guide to optimal management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(10):3621-3634. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28938435/

  13. Desrocher M, Rovet J. Neurocognitive correlates of type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood. Child Neuropsychol. 2004;10(1):36-52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14886695/

  14. Blasetti A, Chiuri RM, Tocco AM, et al. The effect of recurrent severe hypoglycemia on cognitive performance in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011;27(7):719-726. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21695769/

  15. Karges B, Schwandt A, Heidtmann B, et al. Association of insulin pump therapy vs insulin injection therapy with severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and glycemic control among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1358-1366. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2657397

  16. Gentile S, Guarino G, Giancaterini A, Guida P, Strollo F; AMD Calabria-Basilicata Section; AMD Campania Section. A suitable palpation technique allows the detection of lipohypertrophic lesions in insulin-treated people with diabetes. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):563. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27186523/

  17. Frid AH, Kreugel G, Grassi G, et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(9):1231-1255. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.

Free2-min check·
Start assessment