Tresiba (Insulin Degludec) for NAFLD / MASLD: Evidence, Dosing, and Clinical Considerations

Clinical medical image for insulin degludec: Tresiba (Insulin Degludec) for NAFLD / MASLD: Evidence, Dosing, and Clinical Considerations

Tresiba (Insulin Degludec) for NAFLD / MASLD

At a glance

  • Indication / type 1 and type 2 diabetes only; no FDA approval for NAFLD or MASLD
  • MASLD prevalence / 25 to 30% of US adults meet diagnostic criteria
  • DEVOTE trial size / 7,637 patients with T2D and high CV risk
  • Nocturnal hypoglycemia reduction / 53% lower rate vs. insulin glargine U100 in DEVOTE
  • Starting dose (T2D, insulin-naive) / 10 units subcutaneously once daily
  • Dosing flexibility / can be given at any time of day, shifting up to 8 hours between doses
  • Half-life / approximately 25 hours, enabling a flat peakless profile
  • MASLD-specific approval / resmetirom (Rezdiffra) is the only FDA-approved MASH therapy as of 2025
  • Hepatic steatosis threshold / 5% or greater fat fraction by imaging plus at least one metabolic risk factor
  • Hypoglycemia risk and liver disease / impaired gluconeogenesis in advanced fibrosis raises hypoglycemia risk with any insulin

What Is Tresiba, and Why Would a NAFLD / MASLD Patient Need It?

Tresiba is a long-acting basal insulin with an ultra-long, peakless action profile that lasts beyond 42 hours at steady state. It controls fasting glucose in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Patients with MASLD carry a disproportionately high burden of type 2 diabetes: roughly 50 to 70% of people with T2D have concurrent hepatic steatosis, making the overlap between these two conditions clinically very common [1].

Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), the term that replaced NAFLD in 2023 under the AASLD/EASL multi-society consensus, requires hepatic steatosis of 5% or greater by imaging or biopsy plus at least one cardiometabolic risk factor such as a BMI of 25 or higher, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia [2]. Because T2D is itself a cardiometabolic risk factor, any patient using insulin degludec who also has hepatic steatosis on imaging automatically meets the MASLD definition.

Insulin therapy in MASLD serves two indirect roles. First, correcting chronic hyperglycemia reduces hepatic de novo lipogenesis driven by glucose toxicity. Second, lowering insulin resistance, even partially through exogenous insulin supplementation, may reduce the substrate load entering the liver as free fatty acids. Neither mechanism translates to a direct, FDA-reviewed anti-MASH indication for degludec, but both are mechanistically meaningful when glycemic targets are the primary goal [3].

The Endocrine Society's 2022 clinical practice guideline on the management of type 2 diabetes explicitly states: "Basal insulin remains an appropriate and effective option for patients with T2D who have not achieved glycemic targets with non-insulin agents" [4]. Patients with MASLD are not excluded from that recommendation.

DEVOTE Trial: What the Key Evidence Actually Shows

The DEVOTE trial is the most important dataset for understanding insulin degludec's cardiovascular and hypoglycemia profile in high-risk patients, including those likely to have concurrent liver disease. DEVOTE (N=7,637) was a randomized, double-blind, treat-to-target cardiovascular outcomes trial comparing insulin degludec U100 to insulin glargine U100 in adults with T2D and established cardiovascular disease or multiple CV risk factors [5].

At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, the primary endpoint, a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death, occurred in 8.5% of the degludec group versus 9.3% of the glargine group. The hazard ratio was 0.91 (95% CI 0.78, 1.06), confirming non-inferiority (P<0.001 for non-inferiority) [5]. Superiority was not established.

The secondary finding most relevant to MASLD patients was the hypoglycemia rate. Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 4.9% of degludec patients versus 6.6% of glargine patients, a 40% lower rate (rate ratio 0.60 to 95% CI 0.48, 0.76, P<0.001) [5]. Confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia was 53% lower with degludec (rate ratio 0.47 to 95% CI 0.38, 0.58, P<0.001) [5]. This distinction matters in MASLD because advanced hepatic fibrosis impairs gluconeogenesis, the liver's primary defense against hypoglycemia. A basal insulin that causes fewer overnight lows carries a concrete safety advantage in that population.

The DEVOTE EXPLORE sub-analysis (N=1,678) further examined the relationship between severe hypoglycemia and cardiovascular events, finding that each episode of severe hypoglycemia was independently associated with a 2.68-fold higher rate of a major adverse cardiovascular event in the 30 days following that episode [6].

Glycemic Control and Its Effect on Hepatic Steatosis

Does better glucose control from any insulin reduce liver fat? The evidence is nuanced. A 2019 Cochrane review of insulin therapy in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease found insufficient high-quality randomized trial data to make firm conclusions about insulin's direct effect on liver histology [7]. Observational data suggest that chronic hyperglycemia, independent of obesity, drives hepatic lipid accumulation through upregulation of carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) and de novo lipogenesis pathways [8].

The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial (N=7,020) demonstrated that empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor often used alongside basal insulin in T2D, reduced liver stiffness and steatosis in a subset analysis, which is relevant context: insulin degludec alone is not expected to replicate that benefit, but combination therapy may be additive [9].

GLP-1 receptor agonists provide the most direct hepatic fat reduction data. The LEAN trial (N=52) showed that liraglutide 1.8 mg daily for 48 weeks produced NASH resolution in 39% of participants versus 9% on placebo (P=0.019) [10]. The SURMOUNT-1 trial (N=2,539) of tirzepatide showed up to 14.7% body weight reduction at 72 weeks, with hepatic steatosis reduction inferred from visceral adiposity and metabolic marker improvements [11]. These agents are often co-prescribed alongside basal insulin in T2D-MASLD patients, making degludec's low hypoglycemia profile an advantage in combination regimens.

Resmetirom (Rezdiffra), approved by the FDA in March 2024, is the first and currently only drug specifically approved for metabolic-associated steatohepatitis with moderate to advanced fibrosis [12]. Insulin degludec has no comparable MASH indication.

How Tresiba Is Dosed in Patients Who Also Have MASLD

Tresiba dosing follows standard T2D or T1D protocols. MASLD status does not change the approved dosing algorithm, though advanced hepatic fibrosis (F3, F4) requires additional caution because impaired gluconeogenesis amplifies hypoglycemia risk [13].

Insulin-naive type 2 diabetes: Start at 10 units subcutaneously once daily. Titrate by 2 units every 3 days until fasting glucose is 80 to 130 mg/dL per the American Diabetes Association Standards of Care [14]. The Tresiba FDA label allows dose adjustment every 3 to 4 days [15].

Switching from another basal insulin: Convert unit-for-unit from insulin glargine U100 or detemir (some patients switching from detemir may require a dose increase). If switching from glargine U300, begin at 80% of the prior glargine U300 dose to avoid stacking [15].

Dosing flexibility: Tresiba can be administered at any time of day. The interval between consecutive doses should be at least 8 hours. This flexibility is particularly useful in patients with altered eating schedules or gastroparesis related to diabetic autonomic neuropathy, which co-occurs with T2D-MASLD in about 20 to 30% of advanced MASLD cases [16].

Advanced fibrosis (F3, F4): No specific pharmacokinetic adjustment is listed in the FDA label for hepatic impairment, because insulin is metabolized systemically and not primarily by hepatic enzymes [15]. Clinically, however, patients with cirrhosis (F4) should have their insulin dose reduced, sometimes by 30 to 50%, and glucose monitored more frequently because basal insulin clearance may increase as hepatic insulin extraction decreases, leading to prolonged action in some individuals [13].

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2023 practice guidance on MASLD states: "In patients with cirrhosis and diabetes, hypoglycemia risk from insulin therapy is substantially elevated and targets should be individualized, accepting higher glucose goals to minimize hypoglycemia" [17].

A practical HealthRX dosing framework for MASLD-stratified insulin degludec initiation:

  • Fibrosis stage F0, F2: Standard titration. Target fasting glucose 80 to 130 mg/dL. Titrate 2 units every 3 days.
  • Fibrosis stage F3: Begin at 6, 8 units (below the standard 10-unit start). Titrate slowly, 1, 2 units every 5 to 7 days. Target fasting glucose 100 to 140 mg/dL. Monitor for nocturnal hypoglycemia with CGM.
  • Fibrosis stage F4 (compensated cirrhosis): Begin at 4, 6 units. Involve hepatology before initiating. Target fasting glucose 120 to 160 mg/dL. Weekly in-clinic glucose review recommended in the first 4 weeks.

Side Effects That Specifically Matter in MASLD Patients

All insulins share a core adverse-effect profile: hypoglycemia, weight gain, injection-site reactions, and hypokalemia. In MASLD patients, three of these deserve extra attention.

Hypoglycemia. As noted above, advanced fibrosis impairs gluconeogenesis. The liver normally exports glucose to defend against insulin-induced lows. When that capacity is reduced, hypoglycemia episodes become more frequent and more severe. DEVOTE showed degludec produces 53% fewer confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia events versus glargine U100 [5]. That relative benefit does not disappear in hepatic disease, but the absolute risk remains elevated compared to non-MASLD patients. A 2021 analysis in Diabetes Care (N=401 patients with NAFLD and T2D) found that patients with F3, F4 fibrosis had a 2.4-fold higher hypoglycemia event rate on any basal insulin compared to those with F0, F2 [18].

Weight gain. Insulin promotes adipogenesis and increases caloric retention. Mean weight gain in DEVOTE was 1.0 kg with degludec versus 1.0 kg with glargine, essentially identical [5]. In MASLD, any additional weight gain may worsen hepatic steatosis. Co-prescribing a GLP-1 receptor agonist alongside degludec can offset this: the IDegLira combination (insulin degludec 100 units/mL plus liraglutide 3.6 mg/mL, marketed as Xultophy) produced a mean weight loss of 1.4 kg in the DUAL I trial (N=1,663) compared to a 3.0 kg gain with degludec alone [19].

Sodium and fluid retention. Insulin causes renal sodium retention. In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, this may worsen ascites or edema. Dose escalation should be slower and diuretic therapy reviewed concurrently in cirrhotic patients [13].

Comparing Tresiba to Other Therapies Used in T2D-MASLD

MASLD management guidelines increasingly favor agents with direct hepatic benefits when treating concurrent T2D. The table below summarizes the comparative evidence.

Semaglutide 2.4 mg (Wegovy) in the STEP-1 trial (N=1,961) produced 14.9% mean weight loss at 68 weeks versus 2.4% with placebo [20]. A dedicated phase 3 semaglutide trial in NASH showed 59% of participants had NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis at 72 weeks versus 17% with placebo [21]. Tirzepatide 15 mg in SURMOUNT-1 produced 22.5% mean weight loss at 72 weeks [11]. Neither of these agents requires the glycemic-lowering crutch that basal insulin provides when beta-cell function is severely depleted.

Pioglitazone, a PPAR-gamma agonist, reduces hepatic inflammation and fibrosis and is endorsed in the AASLD 2023 guidance as an option for MASH in patients with or without T2D [17]. It can be combined with insulin degludec, though clinicians must account for additive fluid retention and weight gain.

SGLT2 inhibitors such as empagliflozin and dapagliflozin reduce hepatic steatosis by promoting glucosuria and weight loss, and they carry FDA approval for heart failure and CKD, conditions common in advanced MASLD [9]. Adding an SGLT2 inhibitor to a basal insulin regimen often allows dose reduction of the insulin, which lessens hypoglycemia risk and blunts weight gain.

Resmetirom 80 mg or 100 mg daily is now the standard of care for biopsy-confirmed MASH with fibrosis stage F2, F3 in adults who have not responded adequately to lifestyle therapy [12]. It has no interaction with insulin degludec at the pharmacodynamic level, and the two can be used together in patients with both T2D and MASH.

Monitoring Requirements During Tresiba Therapy in MASLD

Standard monitoring for basal insulin applies, with added liver-specific checkpoints.

Glucose monitoring: Fasting glucose daily. A continuous glucose monitor (CGM) is strongly preferred in patients with F3, F4 fibrosis, given the impaired hypoglycemia counter-regulation. The ADA Standards of Care 2024 note that CGM reduces severe hypoglycemia events by approximately 50% versus self-monitored blood glucose in high-risk populations [14].

HbA1c: Every 3 months until at goal, then every 6 months. Patients with cirrhosis may have falsely low HbA1c due to hemolysis and shortened erythrocyte lifespan; fructosamine or glycated albumin may be more accurate surrogates [17].

Liver function tests: ALT, AST, and GGT at baseline and every 6 months. Insulin itself does not cause hepatotoxicity, but worsening transaminases may indicate disease progression requiring a reassessment of the entire treatment plan [2].

Hepatic steatosis imaging: FibroScan (transient elastography) annually in patients with F2 or higher, or when clinical status changes. The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) score on FibroScan can track steatosis grade non-invasively [2].

Lipid panel: Every 6 to 12 months. Insulin lowers free fatty acids acutely, which may modestly reduce triglycerides, but the net lipid effect in MASLD is driven more by the underlying metabolic syndrome than by the insulin itself [3].

Renal function: eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio annually. CKD co-occurs in 20 to 40% of MASLD patients and alters hypoglycemia risk by reducing renal insulin clearance [16].

Tresiba Compared to Glargine in MASLD-Specific Contexts

Insulin glargine (Lantus, Basaglar, Toujeo) and insulin detemir (Levemir) are the two most common basal insulin alternatives to degludec. For MASLD-specific considerations, the main clinical differences come down to hypoglycemia and dosing flexibility.

On hypoglycemia, DEVOTE is the definitive head-to-head. Degludec won on nocturnal hypoglycemia (53% lower rate) and severe hypoglycemia (40% lower rate) [5]. A 2020 meta-analysis in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism (N=8 trials, 9,654 patients) confirmed that degludec consistently reduces nocturnal hypoglycemia versus glargine U100, with a pooled relative risk of 0.46 (95% CI 0.34, 0.62) [22].

On dosing flexibility, degludec's ability to shift the injection time by up to 8 hours on a given day is clinically useful in patients with gastroparesis or erratic eating patterns, both of which are more common in T2D-MASLD patients with advanced disease [16].

Insulin detemir produces slightly less weight gain than glargine in some trials, but it requires twice-daily dosing in about 40% of patients to maintain 24-hour coverage, adding injection burden [23]. Degludec, with its 42-plus-hour action time, reliably covers 24 hours with once-daily dosing.

On cost, insulin glargine biosimilars (Semglee, Rezvoglar) are considerably cheaper than branded Tresiba, which has no biosimilar as of mid-2025. This cost gap matters for uninsured MASLD patients, who often have lower socioeconomic status and higher rates of insurance gaps.

Insurance Coverage and Affordability for MASLD Patients

Tresiba requires a diagnosis of T2D or T1D for insurance coverage. Prescribing it with a diagnosis code of MASLD or NAFLD alone will result in denial. When both T2D and MASLD are documented in the chart, insulin degludec is covered under the diabetes indication by most commercial plans and Medicare Part D, subject to formulary tier and step-therapy requirements [15].

Medicare Part D plans typically place Tresiba on Tier 3 (preferred brand) or Tier 4 (non-preferred brand). Out-of-pocket costs can reach $300, 500 per month without assistance. Novo Nordisk's Patient Assistance Program (My$99Insulin) caps monthly costs at $99 for eligible patients. The income threshold for the full assistance program (My$35Insulin) covers patients at or below 400% of the federal poverty level.

Step therapy is common: many plans require a trial of glargine biosimilar before approving degludec. Physicians can submit a medical necessity exception citing DEVOTE data on reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia (53% lower rate) [5], particularly in patients with documented hypoglycemia unawareness or advanced hepatic fibrosis impairing gluconeogenesis.

Frequently asked questions

Is Tresiba FDA-approved for NAFLD or MASLD?
No. Tresiba (insulin degludec) is FDA-approved only for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults and pediatric patients 1 year and older. It has no approved indication for NAFLD, MASLD, or MASH. Resmetirom (Rezdiffra) is currently the only FDA-approved drug for metabolic-associated steatohepatitis with fibrosis.
How long until Tresiba works for NAFLD or MASLD?
Tresiba does not treat NAFLD or MASLD directly. If the question is how quickly it improves glycemic control, steady-state pharmacokinetics are reached after 2 to 3 days of once-daily dosing. Fasting glucose typically improves within the first week of therapy once the dose is appropriately titrated. Any secondary benefit on hepatic steatosis from improved glucose control would take months to manifest and is not a predictable outcome.
What is the Tresiba dosing for NAFLD or MASLD patients?
There is no MASLD-specific dosing in the FDA label. For insulin-naive type 2 diabetes, start at 10 units subcutaneously once daily and titrate by 2 units every 3 days until fasting glucose is 80 to 130 mg/dL. In patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis (F3 to F4), many clinicians start lower, at 4 to 8 units, because impaired gluconeogenesis raises hypoglycemia risk. A hepatologist should be involved in dosing decisions for patients with cirrhosis.
What side effects matter most for NAFLD or MASLD patients on Tresiba?
Hypoglycemia is the primary concern because advanced hepatic fibrosis impairs the liver's ability to produce glucose in response to low blood sugar. DEVOTE showed degludec produces 53% fewer nocturnal hypoglycemia events versus glargine U100, which is a meaningful advantage. Weight gain (average 1.0 kg in DEVOTE) can worsen hepatic steatosis in MASLD patients who are already overweight. Sodium retention may be problematic in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.
Does insurance cover Tresiba for NAFLD or MASLD?
Insurance covers Tresiba only under a diabetes diagnosis code. MASLD or NAFLD alone will not support reimbursement. When both T2D and MASLD are present, coverage flows through the diabetes indication. Step therapy requiring a prior trial of glargine biosimilar is common. A medical necessity exception citing reduced hypoglycemia in DEVOTE can support override requests for patients with hypoglycemia unawareness or advanced fibrosis.
Can Tresiba be used alongside GLP-1 agonists in MASLD patients?
Yes. Combining a basal insulin with a GLP-1 receptor agonist is a standard T2D strategy endorsed by ADA guidelines. In MASLD patients, this combination offers a secondary benefit: GLP-1 agonists such as semaglutide reduce hepatic steatosis and have shown NASH resolution in trials, while degludec covers fasting glucose. The IDegLira combination product (Xultophy) packages degludec with liraglutide in a single pen.
Does Tresiba cause liver damage?
No. Insulin degludec is not hepatotoxic. The liver does not extensively metabolize it through cytochrome P450 pathways. Insulin is cleared systemically, primarily by insulin-degrading enzyme in muscle, liver, and kidney. Rising transaminases in a patient on Tresiba should be attributed to underlying MASLD progression, concurrent medications, or alcohol, not to the insulin itself.
How does Tresiba compare to semaglutide for a patient with both T2D and MASLD?
Semaglutide has a direct hepatic benefit backed by a phase 3 NASH trial showing 59% NASH resolution versus 17% placebo at 72 weeks, plus substantial weight loss data from STEP-1 (14.9% weight reduction). Tresiba has no direct anti-steatotic effect. For a patient with T2D and MASLD who can tolerate a GLP-1 agonist, current guidelines favor GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP agonists as the preferred add-on after [metformin](/metformin). Basal insulin, including degludec, is reserved for patients who have not achieved glycemic targets with those agents or who need rapid glucose lowering.
Is continuous glucose monitoring recommended when using Tresiba in advanced MASLD?
Yes, in patients with fibrosis stage F3 or F4, a continuous glucose monitor is strongly preferred over fingerstick testing. Impaired hepatic gluconeogenesis in advanced fibrosis makes hypoglycemia harder to self-detect and counteract. The ADA Standards of Care 2024 note that CGM reduces severe hypoglycemia by approximately 50% in high-risk populations, and MASLD with advanced fibrosis qualifies as high risk.
Can Tresiba be used in patients with cirrhosis?
It can, but with significant caution and at reduced starting doses. The FDA label notes no specific dose adjustment for hepatic impairment, but clinical guidance from AASLD recommends individualized, higher glucose targets in cirrhotic patients to minimize hypoglycemia. Many hepatologists recommend starting at 4 to 6 units and titrating very slowly, with weekly glucose review and hepatology involvement.

References

  1. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hepatology. 2019;71(4):1263, 1274. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30187581/
  2. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Hepatology. 2023;78(6):1966, 1986. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37363821/
  3. Gastaldelli A, Cusi K. From NASH to diabetes and from diabetes to NASH: mechanisms and treatment options. JHEP Rep. 2019;1(4):312, 328. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32039379/
  4. Endocrine Society. Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35797694/
  5. Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Degludec versus Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):723, 732. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28605603/
  6. Pieber TR, Marso SP, McGuire DK, et al. DEVOTE 3: temporal relationships between severe hypoglycaemia, cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. Diabetologia. 2017;60(9):1619, 1628. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28733718/
  7. Rakoski MO, Singal AG, Rogers MA, Conjeevaram H. Meta-analysis: insulin sensitizers for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(10):1211, 1221. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20955441/
  8. Erion DM, Shulman GI. Diacylglycerol-mediated insulin resistance. Nat Med. 2010;16(4):400, 402. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20376053/
  9. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117, 2128. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26378978/
  10. Armstrong MJ, Gaunt P, Aithal GP, et al. Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):679, 690. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26608256/
  11. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):205, 216. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35658024/
  12. FDA. FDA Approves First Treatment for Adults with Liver Scarring Due to Fatty Liver Disease. 2024. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-treatment-adults-liver-scarring-due-fatty-liver-disease
  13. Holstein A, Hinze S, Thießen E, Plaschke A, Egberts EH. Clinical implications of hepatogenous diabetes in liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17(6):677, 681. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12100000/
  14. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Care in Diabetes 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S1, S321. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
  15. FDA. Tresiba (insulin degludec injection) Prescribing Information. Novo Nordisk. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/203314lbl.pdf
  16. Targher G, Lonardo A, Byrne CD. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic vascular complications of diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):99, 114. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29286050/
  17. Rinella ME, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2023;77(5):1797, 1835. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36727674/](https://pubmed.ncbi.