HealthRx.com

Coronary CT Angiogram: At-Home and Finger-Prick Options, Normal Ranges, and Optimal Results

Medical lab testing image for Coronary CT Angiogram: At-Home and Finger-Prick Options, Normal Ranges, and Optimal Results
Clinical image for Coronary CT Angiogram: At-Home and Finger-Prick Options, Normal Ranges, and Optimal Results Image: HealthRX.com AI-generated clinical image

At a glance

  • Test type / Non-invasive computed tomography with contrast dye
  • Radiation dose / 1 to 3 mSv with modern dose-reduction protocols
  • Scan duration / 10 to 15 minutes in the scanner; 60 to 90 minutes total with prep
  • Contrast agent / Iodinated contrast (iohexol or iodixanol), IV administered
  • Normal result / No stenosis, no plaque, RADS category 1 or 2
  • Optimal result / CAD-RADS 0 (zero plaque, zero stenosis) on CCTA; or CAC score of 0 if CAC alone is used
  • Finger-prick proxies / hsCRP, Lp(a), ApoB, lipid panel (home kits available)
  • Key guideline / ACC/AHA 2021 Chest Pain Guideline recommends CCTA as first-line for stable chest pain in intermediate-risk patients
  • Frequency / Every 3 to 5 years if baseline is normal; sooner if plaque is detected
  • Cost range / $500, $2,500 USD without insurance; many plans cover it for chest pain evaluation

What a Coronary CT Angiogram Actually Measures

A CCTA uses a 64-slice or higher CT scanner, intravenous iodinated contrast, and ECG-gating to produce three-dimensional images of the coronary arteries. Radiologists can then read plaque burden, stenosis grade, and plaque composition with a standardized reporting system called CAD-RADS 2.0.

The test answers questions that a standard stress test cannot. Stress ECG identifies flow-limiting stenosis only after a vessel is already more than 70% blocked. CCTA can detect soft (non-calcified) plaque years before any blockage develops, which is the entire point of early screening.

What CAD-RADS Categories Mean

The CAD-RADS 2.0 system, published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), grades findings from 0 to 5 [1]:

  • CAD-RADS 0: No plaque, no stenosis. Optimal result.
  • CAD-RADS 1: 1 to 24% stenosis, minimal plaque. Clinically normal with preventive follow-up.
  • CAD-RADS 2: 25 to 49% stenosis, mild disease. Lifestyle and statin therapy typically indicated.
  • CAD-RADS 3: 50 to 69% stenosis, moderate. Functional testing (FFR-CT or stress MRI) usually ordered next.
  • CAD-RADS 4A/4B: 70 to 99% stenosis or left main disease. Invasive angiography or revascularization considered.
  • CAD-RADS 5: Total occlusion.

Modifiers for high-risk plaque features (low-attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, spotty calcification) can upgrade any category. A CAD-RADS 2 lesion with three high-risk features carries different prognostic weight than one without.

Plaque Composition: Why It Matters More Than Stenosis Grade

Calcified plaque is stable. Non-calcified (soft) plaque, especially low-attenuation plaque with a CT density <30 Hounsfield units, is the type most likely to rupture and cause a heart attack [2]. CCTA is the only non-invasive test that distinguishes these two. A patient with 40% stenosis and predominantly soft plaque may need more aggressive lipid therapy than one with 60% calcified stenosis, a nuance a calcium score alone misses entirely.


Coronary CT Angiogram Normal Range and Optimal Values

The term "normal" in CCTA refers to the absence of reportable stenosis or plaque. The term "optimal" goes further: it means zero plaque of any type.

Normal Range

A result classified as CAD-RADS 1 or below is considered within normal limits in most cardiology practices. This includes minimal calcified plaque with less than 25% luminal narrowing. The ACC/AHA 2019 Primary Prevention Guidelines state that a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of zero "may be used to reclassify intermediate-risk patients to a lower-risk tier to avoid or delay statin therapy," and the same logic applies to a CCTA showing minimal plaque [3].

Optimal Range

CAD-RADS 0 is the optimal result. It means no identifiable atherosclerosis on contrast-enhanced imaging. In the CONFIRM registry (N=27,125), patients with a completely normal CCTA had a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate of less than 1% over five years [4]. That five-year warranty period is now referenced in the SCCT guidelines as a basis for deferring repeat imaging when the baseline scan is CAD-RADS 0.

For practical longevity medicine use, the optimal target is:

  • CCTA: CAD-RADS 0 with no high-risk plaque modifiers
  • CAC score (the simpler, no-contrast companion test): 0 Agatston units
  • Plaque volume on quantitative CCTA: 0 mm³ non-calcified plaque

How CCTA Compares to Simpler Tests

CCTA is not always the right first step. Understanding where it sits relative to other tests helps you decide whether to start with blood work or go straight to imaging.

CAC Score vs. CCTA

The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is cheaper ($75, $300), requires no contrast, delivers a lower radiation dose (roughly 0.5 to 1 mSv), and takes under five minutes. Its limitation: it scores only calcified plaque and misses soft plaque entirely.

In the MESA study (N=6,814), a CAC score of 0 was associated with a ten-year cardiovascular event rate of roughly 2.5% even in adults with multiple risk factors [5]. That is reassuring but not definitive. A 50-year-old smoker with a CAC of 0 may still harbor significant soft plaque. CCTA would catch it; a CAC score would not.

If your CAC score is 0 and your risk factors are low, CCTA adds little. If your CAC score is above 100, you likely already have an indication for statin therapy, and CCTA can further characterize the plaque to guide intensity.

Stress Testing vs. CCTA

The PROMISE trial (N=10,003) compared CCTA to functional stress testing in symptomatic patients and found no significant difference in clinical outcomes at two years, but CCTA diagnosed significantly more obstructive CAD and led to earlier initiation of preventive therapies [6]. Abnormal CCTA findings led to more downstream catheterizations, which some see as a downside, though it also translated to earlier revascularization in appropriate patients.

Cardiac MRI

MRI avoids radiation and iodinated contrast. It can image plaque in the carotid and aorta but has limited spatial resolution for the small coronary arteries. Coronary MRA remains a research tool in most centers.


At-Home and Finger-Prick Options: What You Can Actually Test Without a Scanner

No consumer device images coronary arteries. That sentence ends the discussion of "at-home CCTA." What at-home testing can do is measure the blood biomarkers that predict who needs a CCTA in the first place.

High-Sensitivity CRP (hsCRP)

HsCRP is an inflammatory marker produced by the liver in response to arterial inflammation. The JUPITER trial (N=17,802) found that rosuvastatin 20 mg reduced cardiovascular events by 44% in patients with LDL <130 mg/dL but hsCRP above 2.0 mg/L, demonstrating that elevated hsCRP independently identifies high-risk individuals even when standard lipids appear acceptable [7].

At-home finger-prick hsCRP tests are available through several direct-to-consumer labs. An hsCRP below 1.0 mg/L is low risk; 1.0 to 3.0 mg/L is intermediate; above 3.0 mg/L is high risk for cardiovascular events, per the American Heart Association/CDC scientific statement [8].

Apolipoprotein B (ApoB)

ApoB is the structural protein on every atherogenic lipoprotein particle (LDL, VLDL, IDL, Lp(a)). Particle count, not particle cholesterol content, drives plaque deposition. The 2019 ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guidelines recommend ApoB as the primary therapeutic target in patients with metabolic syndrome, diabetes, or hypertriglyceridemia [9].

Optimal ApoB for primary prevention: <90 mg/dL. For high-risk patients: <65 mg/dL. Several at-home finger-prick kits now include ApoB.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a))

Lp(a) is a genetically determined, largely diet-independent lipoprotein. The Copenhagen Heart Study found that Lp(a) above 50 mg/dL (approximately 105 nmol/L) was associated with a 3-fold increase in myocardial infarction risk compared to levels below 10 mg/dL [10]. Testing once in a lifetime is sufficient for most people because the value is roughly 90% heritable. Home finger-prick panels that include Lp(a) exist but are less common; venipuncture from a local draw site is more reliable for this analyte.

Standard Lipid Panel with Direct LDL

Fasting and non-fasting lipid panels are available via finger-prick at home. Non-HDL cholesterol and direct LDL are the most clinically useful outputs. The ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations use total cholesterol, HDL, age, sex, race, systolic BP, smoking status, and diabetes status to estimate 10-year ASCVD risk, and free calculators accept home-lab inputs [3].

NT-proBNP and High-Sensitivity Troponin

These two cardiac biomarkers are not plaque tests. They detect myocardial stress (NT-proBNP) and myocyte injury (hs-troponin). Some concierge labs offer them in panel form. A clearly elevated hs-troponin in an asymptomatic adult is a red flag that warrants urgent in-person evaluation, not further home testing.


Who Should Get a CCTA: Indications and Guidelines

The 2021 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain gives CCTA a Class I, Level of Evidence B-R recommendation as the preferred initial test for patients with acute or stable chest pain and intermediate pre-test probability [11]. Outside of chest pain evaluation, CCTA is increasingly used for:

  • Asymptomatic adults aged 40 to 75 with an intermediate 10-year ASCVD risk (7.5 to 20%) and a CAC score in the 1 to 99 range, where plaque characterization changes management
  • Athletes with anomalous coronary artery suspected on echocardiogram
  • Pre-operative coronary evaluation in select non-cardiac surgery candidates
  • Longevity medicine patients requesting comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping

When CCTA Is Not Appropriate

CCTA is contraindicated or suboptimal in patients with:

  • Severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m²) due to contrast nephropathy risk
  • Known iodinated contrast allergy without adequate premedication
  • Atrial fibrillation or persistent tachycardia (>65 bpm on beta-blockade) causing motion artifact
  • BMI above 40 in older scanners (image quality degrades, though photon-counting CT mitigates this)
  • Extensive prior calcification (heavy calcium blooms obscure lumen assessment)

For these patients, cardiac MRI, nuclear stress testing, or invasive coronary angiography may be preferable.


How to Prepare for a CCTA

Beta-Blocker Protocol

Heart rate control is the single most important preparation variable. Most centers target 55 to 65 bpm for optimal image quality. Oral metoprolol tartrate 50 to 100 mg is typically given 60 minutes before the scan. Patients already on beta-blockers may need an additional 25 to 50 mg dose. Calcium channel blockers (diltiazem 60 mg) are used when beta-blockers are contraindicated.

Nitrate Administration

Sublingual nitroglycerin 0.4 mg or spray is administered immediately before the scan to vasodilate the coronary arteries and improve luminal visualization. Sildenafil and other PDE5 inhibitors must be held for at least 24 hours beforehand to avoid severe hypotension.

Contrast Hydration

Patients should drink 500 mL of water in the two hours before the scan and 1,000 mL after. For anyone with borderline renal function (eGFR 45 to 59), N-acetylcysteine 600 mg twice daily for 48 hours pre- and post-contrast may be prescribed, though evidence for this intervention is mixed [12].

Day-of Checklist

  • No caffeine for 12 hours (caffeine raises heart rate)
  • No heavy exercise for 24 hours
  • Hold metformin for 48 hours post-scan if eGFR <60 (contrast-related lactic acidosis risk)
  • Wear comfortable clothing without metal; chest leads will be placed for ECG-gating

Interpreting Your CCTA Report: A Practical Framework

Most CCTA reports include four sections: scan quality, CAD-RADS classification, lesion-level description, and incidental findings. Patients and clinicians often focus only on the CAD-RADS category and miss key information in the other three sections.

Scan Quality: A report noting "good" or "excellent" image quality is reliable. A report noting "limited by motion artifact" or "heavy calcification" should prompt discussion about whether findings could be underestimated.

Lesion-Level Description: This section lists each vessel and each lesion individually. A left anterior descending (LAD) lesion of any type carries higher prognostic weight than a right coronary artery (RCA) or circumflex lesion of the same grade, because the LAD supplies the largest myocardial territory.

Plaque Composition Modifiers: The presence of any of the following raises the lesion to "high-risk plaque" status regardless of stenosis grade: low-attenuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, positive remodeling index above 1.1, or spotty calcification. Each modifier independently predicts a higher five-year MACE rate.

Incidental Findings: CCTA images the chest from the aortic arch to the diaphragm. Lung nodules, aortic dilation, pericardial effusions, and thyroid masses are commonly found incidentally. Each incidental finding needs a documented follow-up plan.


Radiation Dose and Safety

A modern prospective ECG-triggered CCTA on a 256-slice or dual-source scanner delivers approximately 1 to 3 mSv of effective radiation dose with iterative reconstruction and tube current modulation [13]. For reference:

  • Annual background radiation (US average): 3 mSv
  • Conventional invasive coronary angiography: 5 to 12 mSv
  • CT pulmonary angiogram: 6 to 8 mSv
  • Chest X-ray: 0.1 mSv

Photon-counting CT (approved by the FDA in 2021 for the Siemens NAEOTOM Alpha) reduces dose further to below 1 mSv in some protocols while improving spatial resolution to 0.2 mm [14]. For a 45-year-old patient getting their first lifetime CCTA, the absolute lifetime attributable cancer risk from this dose is estimated at less than 0.05%, according to the National Cancer Institute BEIR VII report.


After the Scan: What Comes Next Based on Your Result

CAD-RADS 0 or 1 (No or Minimal Disease)

Reassurance, lifestyle optimization, and repeat CCTA in three to five years if risk factors persist. The five-year warranty period from the CONFIRM registry applies here [4].

CAD-RADS 2 (Mild, 25 to 49% Stenosis)

The ACC/AHA 2019 Primary Prevention Guidelines support initiating moderate-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin 10 to 20 mg or rosuvastatin 5 to 10 mg) for patients with mild plaque detected incidentally or through screening, especially if ApoB is above 90 mg/dL or Lp(a) is elevated [3]. Annual clinical follow-up and repeat CCTA in three years is reasonable.

CAD-RADS 3 (Moderate, 50 to 69% Stenosis)

Functional assessment is the next step. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT), using HeartFlow analysis, can determine whether a 50 to 69% stenosis is flow-limiting without an additional procedure [15]. A positive FFR-CT (value <0.80) indicates hemodynamically significant disease and typically prompts invasive angiography or optimization of medical therapy with high-intensity statins (atorvastatin 40 to 80 mg), ACE inhibitors, and antiplatelet therapy.

CAD-RADS 4 or 5 (Severe or Occlusive Disease)

Referral to interventional cardiology. Depending on anatomy and symptoms, options include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).


Cost, Insurance, and Access

CCTA costs $500, $2,500 out-of-pocket in the United States. Insurance coverage varies substantially:

  • Medicare covers CCTA under specific ICD-10 codes related to chest pain evaluation (R07.x) and selected structural heart disease evaluation.
  • Most commercial insurers cover it with a Class I indication (chest pain with intermediate pre-test probability) per the 2021 ACC/AHA guideline [11].
  • Asymptomatic screening CCTA is rarely covered; patients in longevity medicine programs often pay cash.

The CAC score, by contrast, costs $75, $300 and is frequently offered as a cash-pay service through hospital radiology departments, making it a more accessible entry point before committing to full CCTA.


Frequently asked questions

What is the optimal range for a coronary CT angiogram?
The optimal result is CAD-RADS 0: no identifiable plaque and no stenosis on contrast-enhanced imaging. In the CONFIRM registry (N=27,125), a CAD-RADS 0 result was associated with a major adverse cardiac event rate below 1% over five years. For the companion coronary artery calcium score, 0 Agatston units is the optimal value.
What is a normal coronary CT angiogram result?
A result of CAD-RADS 1 (1-24% stenosis, minimal plaque) or below is considered within normal clinical limits. CAD-RADS 0 is normal and optimal. CAD-RADS 2 indicates mild disease that warrants preventive therapy but is not considered obstructive coronary disease.
Can I do a coronary CT angiogram at home?
No. A coronary CT angiogram requires a hospital or imaging center CT scanner, intravenous iodinated contrast, ECG-gating, and specialist interpretation. At-home testing cannot image the coronary arteries. What you can do at home is measure risk biomarkers like hsCRP, ApoB, LDL, and Lp(a) through finger-prick or mail-in blood tests.
What finger-prick tests are most useful before a CCTA?
The most clinically relevant finger-prick or at-home blood tests for coronary risk are: ApoB (optimal target below 90 mg/dL for primary prevention), hsCRP (low risk below 1.0 mg/L), a standard lipid panel including non-HDL cholesterol, and [fasting glucose](/labs-fasting-glucose/what-it-measures) or [HbA1c](/labs-hba1c/what-it-measures). Lp(a) is best measured once via venipuncture because it is largely genetic and does not change with diet.
How often should I repeat a coronary CT angiogram?
If your baseline CCTA is CAD-RADS 0, repeating in 3-5 years is a reasonable interval based on the five-year warranty period described in SCCT guidelines and supported by CONFIRM registry data. If you have CAD-RADS 2 plaque, repeat in approximately 3 years or sooner if symptoms change. CAD-RADS 3 or higher usually triggers a different diagnostic pathway rather than surveillance reimaging.
What is the difference between a coronary CT angiogram and a coronary calcium score?
A coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a non-contrast CT scan that detects only calcified plaque and scores it in Agatston units. It delivers roughly 0.5-1 mSv and costs $75-$300. A CCTA uses contrast dye, delivers 1-3 mSv, costs $500-$2,500, and images both calcified and non-calcified (soft) plaque while grading stenosis. CCTA provides far more information but is more expensive, more complex, and requires contrast.
Is a coronary CT angiogram safe during pregnancy?
CCTA is generally avoided during pregnancy due to radiation and iodinated contrast exposure. If coronary imaging is clinically necessary during pregnancy, cardiac MRI without gadolinium or a modified low-dose protocol with radiation shielding may be considered after multidisciplinary consultation. The decision must weigh maternal diagnostic need against fetal risk.
What heart rate do I need for a good quality coronary CT angiogram?
Most centers target a [resting heart rate](/labs-resting-hr/what-it-measures) of 55-65 beats per minute at the time of scanning. Heart rates above 65 bpm cause motion artifact and degrade image quality. Your cardiologist or radiologist will typically administer oral metoprolol tartrate 50-100 mg approximately 60 minutes before the scan if your natural rate is above that target.
Can a coronary CT angiogram miss a heart attack risk?
A normal CCTA result substantially reduces but does not eliminate heart attack risk. CCTA can miss microscopic plaque below imaging resolution, plaque in very distal small vessels, and coronary vasospasm. In the CONFIRM registry, even CAD-RADS 0 patients had a small residual event rate. Biomarker testing (ApoB, Lp(a), hsCRP) and lifestyle assessment complement CCTA for comprehensive risk stratification.
What medications should I avoid before a coronary CT angiogram?
Hold caffeine (coffee, tea, energy drinks) for 12 hours before the scan because it raises heart rate. Hold sildenafil ([Viagra](/viagra-sildenafil)), [tadalafil](/cialis-tadalafil) (Cialis), and other PDE5 inhibitors for at least 24 hours before the scan because sublingual nitroglycerin is given on the day and combining them causes dangerous hypotension. Hold metformin for 48 hours after the scan if your eGFR is below 60 mL/min. Continue all other cardiac medications unless specifically instructed otherwise.
Does insurance cover a coronary CT angiogram for asymptomatic screening?
In most cases, no. Commercial insurers and Medicare typically cover CCTA when there is a documented indication such as stable or acute chest pain with intermediate pre-test probability, consistent with the 2021 ACC/AHA Chest Pain Guideline Class I recommendation. Asymptomatic screening CCTA ordered purely for longevity evaluation is usually a cash-pay expense ranging from $500 to $2,500 depending on the facility.
How much radiation does a coronary CT angiogram deliver?
A modern prospective ECG-triggered CCTA on a 256-slice or dual-source scanner delivers approximately 1-3 mSv with dose-reduction techniques. Next-generation photon-counting CT (such as the FDA-cleared Siemens NAEOTOM Alpha) can reduce this below 1 mSv. For comparison, annual US background radiation averages 3 mSv, and a conventional invasive coronary angiogram delivers 5-12 mSv.

References

  1. Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADS 2.0: 2022 Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(10):1699-1714. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36007594/

  2. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(1):49-57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19555840/

  3. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596-e646. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30879355/

  4. Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings: results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(8):849-860. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21835321/

  5. Blaha MJ, Cainzos-Achirica M, Greenland P, et al. Role of coronary artery calcium score of zero and other negative risk markers for cardiovascular disease: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2016;133(9):849-858. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26864093/

  6. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1291-1300. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25773919/

  7. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195-2207. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18997196/

  8. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice. Circulation. 2003;107(3):499-511. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12551878/

  9. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-188. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31504418/

  10. Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, Nordestgaard BG. Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2009;301(22):2331-2339. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19509380/

  11. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain. Circulation. 2021;144(22):e368-e454. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34709879/

  12. ACT Investigators. Acetylcysteine for prevention of renal outcomes in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral vascular angiography. Circulation. 2011;124(11):1250-1259. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21859972/

  13. Lell MM, Wildberger JE, Alkadhi H, Damilakis J, Kachelriess M. Evolution in computed tomography: the battle for speed and dose. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(9):629-644. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26200510/

  14. Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, Pelc NJ, Fleischmann D. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology. 2018;289(2):293-312. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30179101/

  15. Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1145-1155. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24486266/

For More Info Visit HealthRx.com
Visit Now