ESR At-Home and Finger-Prick Options: Normal Range, Optimal Targets, and What Your Result Means

Medical lab testing image for ESR At-Home and Finger-Prick Options: Normal Range, Optimal Targets, and What Your Result Means

At a glance

  • Test type / whole-blood inflammation marker (mm/hr)
  • Standard male reference / 0 to 15 mm/hr (age <50); 0 to 20 mm/hr (age ≥50)
  • Standard female reference / 0 to 20 mm/hr (age <50); 0 to 30 mm/hr (age ≥50)
  • Longevity-medicine optimal target / <10 mm/hr for adults under 60
  • Westergren method / gold-standard lab technique per ICSH guidelines
  • At-home options / finger-prick dried-blood-spot cards or venipuncture mail-in kits
  • Turnaround time / 1 to 3 business days for most mail-in services
  • Key confounders / pregnancy, anemia, obesity, age can all raise ESR independently of disease
  • Companion tests / CRP, fibrinogen, IL-6 for full inflammatory picture
  • Retest interval / every 3 to 6 months when managing active inflammation; annually for surveillance

What Is ESR and Why Does It Matter for Chronic Inflammation?

ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) quantifies how quickly red blood cells settle to the bottom of a vertical tube in one hour. Elevated acute-phase proteins, particularly fibrinogen, coat red cells and cause them to clump and fall faster. The result is a simple, cheap, century-old proxy for systemic inflammation that remains recommended by the American College of Rheumatology for initial evaluation of suspected giant cell arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and several autoimmune conditions. [1]

How the Westergren Method Works

The Westergren method, endorsed by the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH), uses 2 mL of anticoagulated venous blood drawn into a 200 mm tube. The column is read at exactly 60 minutes. [2] Automated analyzers now replicate this method using photo-optical detection, reducing technician error and improving reproducibility. Most CLIA-certified reference labs, including LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics, use automated Westergren-equivalent analyzers.

Why Clinicians Still Order ESR in the Age of CRP

High-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) responds faster and is more specific, but ESR captures a different part of the inflammatory cascade. ESR reflects fibrinogen, immunoglobulins, and other large plasma proteins, so it tends to stay elevated longer after an acute event. A 2019 analysis in the Annals of Internal Medicine noted that ESR and CRP together carry more diagnostic information than either alone for polymyalgia rheumatica. [3] For that reason, most rheumatology and longevity medicine protocols order both markers simultaneously.

ESR as a Longevity Biomarker

Chronic low-grade inflammation is now widely recognized as a driver of cardiovascular disease, metabolic dysfunction, and accelerated biological aging. A large prospective cohort study (N=4,953) published in JAMA found that adults with persistently elevated inflammatory markers, including ESR, had significantly higher all-cause mortality over 10 years. [4] Longevity clinicians therefore treat ESR not just as a disease-detection tool but as a modifiable risk indicator worth optimizing over time.


ESR Normal Range: Standard Reference Intervals vs. Optimal Targets

Reference ranges and optimal targets are not the same number. The standard range tells you whether you differ from the general population. The optimal target tells you where the lowest disease risk appears to cluster.

Standard Reference Ranges by Age and Sex

The most-cited reference intervals come from the Westergren method validation literature and are reproduced in UpToDate and major lab handbooks [2]:

| Population | Standard Reference Range | |---|---| | Males age <50 | 0 to 15 mm/hr | | Males age ≥50 | 0 to 20 mm/hr | | Females age <50 | 0 to 20 mm/hr | | Females age ≥50 | 0 to 30 mm/hr | | Pregnant (any trimester) | Up to 70 mm/hr may be physiologic | | Children | 0 to 10 mm/hr |

These ranges were established in reference populations that include many adults with subclinical metabolic disease, so "normal" here does not mean optimal. A value of 18 mm/hr in a 45-year-old man is within the standard range but may still reflect meaningful inflammatory burden.

Optimal ESR Targets for Longevity and Metabolic Health

Based on published cardiovascular risk data and the position of functional medicine and longevity-focused societies, the following target tiers are used by the HealthRX clinical team:

Tier 1 (Optimal): <10 mm/hr for adults under age 60; <15 mm/hr for adults over 60.

Tier 2 (Acceptable): 10 to 20 mm/hr, warrants investigation of diet, sleep quality, body composition, and chronic infection.

Tier 3 (Elevated, act): >20 mm/hr in men or >30 mm/hr in women under 50, or any value >40 mm/hr in either sex, requires workup to rule out active autoimmune disease, malignancy, or chronic infection. [5]

A longitudinal study of 1,827 adults published in Circulation found that ESR >20 mm/hr at baseline was associated with a 1.6-fold increase in incident cardiovascular events after adjustment for traditional risk factors. [6] The signal for ESR is weaker than for hsCRP, but it adds independent predictive value, particularly in women.

What Raises ESR Without Active Disease

Several physiologic and technical factors push ESR higher and can mislead interpretation:

  • Pregnancy (especially second and third trimesters) [7]
  • Obesity (BMI >30 is associated with ESR increases of 5 to 10 mm/hr on average)
  • Anemia (fewer red cells means less competitive sedimentation, so ESR rises)
  • Age (every decade over 50 shifts the reference range upward by roughly 3 to 5 mm/hr) [2]
  • Female sex hormones (estrogen increases fibrinogen, raising ESR)
  • Macrocytosis from B12 or folate deficiency

Polycythemia and sickle cell disease, by contrast, falsely lower ESR. Any result outside the expected range should be reviewed alongside a complete blood count (CBC) and hsCRP before a clinical conclusion is drawn.


At-Home ESR Testing: What Options Actually Exist?

Getting an ESR outside a clinic requires understanding which collection methods work, which labs accept mail-in specimens, and what the turnaround looks like. Options have expanded considerably since 2020.

Venipuncture Mail-In Kits

Several CLIA-certified direct-to-consumer lab services allow you to order an ESR panel online, receive a blood-draw kit, and visit a partnered phlebotomy location (e.g., Quest Patient Service Centers, Labcorp, or Getlabs mobile phlebotomy). Results are delivered to a secure online portal. Services like Ulta Lab Tests, Any Lab Test Now, and Walk-In Lab offer standalone ESR or inflammation panels that include ESR, hsCRP, and fibrinogen for $30, $80 depending on panel composition.

This approach uses standard venipuncture and Westergren-equivalent automated analysis, so results are directly comparable to clinic-ordered labs. No physician order is required in most U.S. States under direct-access testing laws, though a few states (New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island) still require a provider order. [8]

Finger-Prick and Dried-Blood-Spot Cards

Finger-prick collection for ESR is technically more challenging than for lipid panels or HbA1c, because ESR requires whole anticoagulated blood in sufficient volume to fill a Westergren tube or its automated equivalent. True finger-prick ESR with a standard Westergren read is not yet widely available as a validated at-home test.

However, two categories of near-equivalent options do exist:

1. Microsampling tubes with mail-in processing. Companies such as Tasso and Drawbridge Health offer VACUETTE-style microcollection tubes that use a small lancet device on the upper arm or fingertip to collect 500 to 1,000 µL of capillary blood. Some CLIA labs accept these for ESR using micro-method adaptations, though analytic sensitivity may differ slightly from standard Westergren. [9]

2. Inflammatory panel cards that estimate systemic inflammation without ESR. Several at-home services (Everlywell, LetsGetChecked, Function Health) include hsCRP on their finger-prick dried-blood-spot cards. Because hsCRP correlates strongly with ESR in most clinical contexts (r approximately 0.65 to 0.75 in published meta-analyses) [10], a clinician may choose to use hsCRP as a proxy when true ESR collection is impractical.

If your primary goal is monitoring chronic low-grade inflammation for metabolic or longevity purposes, finger-prick hsCRP is a validated, accessible substitute. If your clinician specifically needs an ESR (as in monitoring polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis), insist on venipuncture-based Westergren-equivalent analysis.

Mobile Phlebotomy as a Middle Ground

Services like Getlabs, Phlebotomy U, and DxHome dispatch a licensed phlebotomist to your home or office. The blood draw uses standard EDTA tubes. Specimens are transported to a reference lab within the window required for valid ESR analysis (typically within 4 hours of collection for refrigerated transport, per ICSH guidelines). [2] Cost is typically $50, $100 for the mobile draw fee plus the lab fee. This is the highest-fidelity at-home option for ESR specifically.


How to Prepare for an ESR Test and Avoid False Results

ESR does not require fasting, but several preparation steps reduce the chance of a misleading result.

Pre-Test Preparation

Avoid strenuous exercise for 24 hours before collection. High-intensity exercise transiently raises ESR by 10 to 15 mm/hr in trained individuals. [11] Collect the sample in the morning when possible, because ESR shows mild diurnal variation, with values 10 to 20% lower in early morning compared with late afternoon. [2]

Disclose all medications to your ordering provider. NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen) and corticosteroids suppress ESR and may mask disease activity. Oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy raise ESR via estrogen-driven fibrinogen increases. [12]

Shipping and Specimen Stability

For mail-in venipuncture kits, EDTA tubes must be kept upright and at room temperature (15 to 25°C). ESR is specimen-sensitive: samples analyzed more than 4 hours after collection at room temperature may produce falsely elevated results. Refrigerated samples (2 to 8°C) are stable for up to 12 hours. Most mail-in ESR kits include a cold pack and a pre-paid overnight shipping label. Confirm with the testing lab that the collection-to-analysis window meets their validated method criteria before ordering.


Interpreting Your ESR Result: A Step-by-Step Clinical Framework

An ESR number in isolation is not a diagnosis. It is a prompt to ask the next question.

Step 1: Compare Against Age- and Sex-Adjusted Reference Range

Use the table provided in the "Normal Range" section above. A 55-year-old woman with an ESR of 28 mm/hr is within standard range. A 30-year-old man with the same value is mildly elevated and warrants follow-up.

Step 2: Cross-Reference with hsCRP

If both ESR and hsCRP are elevated, the probability of a clinically significant inflammatory process is higher than if only one marker is raised. The 2023 ACR guidelines for polymyalgia rheumatica state: "ESR ≥50 mm/hr and/or CRP above the upper limit of normal are required for classification criteria to be met." [1] A discordant result (ESR elevated, hsCRP normal) often reflects non-inflammatory causes of high ESR such as anemia, hypergammaglobulinemia, or technical error.

Step 3: Rule Out Confounders

Order a CBC to check for anemia, polycythemia, or macrocytosis. Check serum protein electrophoresis if ESR is markedly elevated (>50 mm/hr) without clear cause, because monoclonal immunoglobulins dramatically increase ESR. [13]

Step 4: Assess Trend, Not Just Single Value

A single elevated ESR in an asymptomatic person is less actionable than a trend. In a review of inflammatory marker trajectories in 2,400 adults, ESR that rose by >10 mm/hr over 12 months without explanation was associated with a 2.3-fold increase in the likelihood of an underlying autoimmune or hematologic diagnosis within 3 years. [14] Repeat the test in 4 to 8 weeks if you have no other explanation, and sooner if new symptoms develop.


ESR in the Context of Autoimmune and Chronic Disease Monitoring

ESR has a specific, guideline-supported role beyond general inflammation screening.

Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica

The American College of Rheumatology 2023 classification criteria for giant cell arteritis list ESR ≥50 mm/hr as a weighted criterion. [1] An ESR above 100 mm/hr in a person over 50 with new headache, scalp tenderness, or jaw claudication is a medical urgency: the risk of permanent vision loss from anterior ischemic optic neuropathy is approximately 15 to 20% if treatment is delayed. [15] This is one clinical context where at-home testing is not appropriate as the first step. Go to an emergency department or same-day rheumatology consult.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity

The Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28-ESR) uses ESR as one of four inputs. In clinical trials of biologic DMARDs, including the AMPLE trial comparing abatacept versus adalimumab (N=646), ESR normalization was used as a secondary endpoint to confirm systemic inflammation reduction. [16] Patients self-monitoring RA at home may find at-home ESR via mail-in venipuncture a useful between-visit tool to track flares.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Risk

Patients with CKD often show persistently elevated ESR due to anemia, dysfibrinogenemia, and uremia-driven inflammation. A 2021 cohort study in JASN (N=3,120) found that ESR >30 mm/hr in CKD stage 3 to 4 patients was independently associated with 40% higher risk of cardiovascular events over 5 years. [17] Monthly at-home monitoring may be appropriate in this population if ordered by a nephrologist.


How to Lower Your ESR: Evidence-Based Strategies

Lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions can reduce ESR, and the data are reasonably solid.

Anti-Inflammatory Diet Patterns

A randomized trial published in JAMA Internal Medicine tested the Mediterranean diet in 180 participants over 12 months. ESR fell by a mean of 6.2 mm/hr in the Mediterranean-diet arm versus 1.1 mm/hr in the control arm (P<0.01). [18] The effect was larger in participants who had baseline ESR >15 mm/hr. Specific dietary changes with documented ESR-lowering effects include increasing omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil 2 to 4 g/day EPA+DHA), reducing refined carbohydrates, and increasing polyphenol-rich vegetables.

Weight Loss

Obesity independently raises ESR. In a bariatric surgery cohort (N=312) published in Obesity Surgery, ESR fell from a mean of 31 mm/hr preoperatively to 16 mm/hr at 12 months post-surgery, paralleling the reduction in BMI from 42 to 29. [19] Even modest weight loss of 5 to 10% of body weight produces meaningful ESR reductions in overweight individuals.

Sleep Quality and Stress Reduction

Chronic sleep restriction (<6 hours/night) raises inflammatory markers including ESR. In a controlled sleep study, extending sleep from 6.5 to 8.5 hours over 4 weeks reduced ESR by approximately 4 mm/hr in participants with baseline values >10 mm/hr. [20] Stress management techniques (mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy) have smaller but measurable effects on inflammatory markers in randomized controlled trials.

Pharmacologic Reduction

When ESR is driven by an active autoimmune process, disease-modifying treatment is necessary and effective. In a 52-week analysis of methotrexate in early RA (N=221), ESR normalized (fell below 20 mm/hr) in 58% of patients who achieved ACR50 response. [21] Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) at 1.5 to 4.5 mg/night has shown ESR-lowering effects in small trials of Crohn's disease and fibromyalgia, though larger RCTs are needed before this can be recommended broadly. [22]


Comparing At-Home ESR Options: A Decision Guide

| Method | ESR Accuracy | Cost (approx.) | Turnaround | Best For | |---|---|---|---|---| | Clinic venipuncture (Westergren) | Gold standard | $10, $40 lab fee | Same day | Diagnosis, disease monitoring | | Mobile phlebotomy (mail-in) | Near gold standard | $60, $140 total | 1 to 2 days | At-home convenience, repeat monitoring | | Direct-access lab (walk-in) | Near gold standard | $30, $80 | 1 to 3 days | No physician needed in most states | | Microcapillary tube (mail-in) | Acceptable, method-dependent | $50, $100 | 2 to 4 days | Limited mobility patients | | Finger-prick hsCRP card | Proxy, not true ESR | $20, $50 | 2 to 5 days | Longevity monitoring, trend tracking |

For monitoring chronic inflammation in a generally healthy adult, finger-prick hsCRP combined with annual venipuncture ESR is a practical and cost-efficient protocol.


Who Should Test ESR Regularly?

Annual ESR testing is reasonable for adults with any of the following:

  • A personal or family history of autoimmune disease (rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, ankylosing spondylitis)
  • Persistent fatigue, unexplained weight loss, or musculoskeletal pain without clear diagnosis
  • Metabolic syndrome or BMI >30, as part of a comprehensive inflammatory panel
  • Established cardiovascular disease, where inflammatory burden informs secondary prevention
  • Age over 50 with new headache or shoulder/hip girdle stiffness (screen for PMR/GCA)
  • Patients on hormone therapy (TRT, HRT), because exogenous estrogen raises ESR and baseline tracking is needed

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force does not currently issue a recommendation for ESR screening in asymptomatic adults, which means the decision rests with the individual clinician based on pretest probability and patient preference. [23]


Frequently asked questions

What is the optimal ESR range for longevity?
Most longevity-focused clinicians target ESR below 10 mm/hr for adults under age 60 and below 15 mm/hr for adults over 60. Standard laboratory reference ranges are higher (up to 20 mm/hr in younger men and 30 mm/hr in younger women) but were established in population samples that include subclinical disease. Values in the single digits suggest minimal acute-phase protein activity.
Can I test ESR at home without a blood draw?
True Westergren ESR requires venipuncture or capillary blood collection in an anticoagulant tube, then lab processing within 4 hours. You cannot perform the analysis at home with current consumer devices. Your closest at-home option is ordering a mail-in venipuncture kit through a direct-access lab service, scheduling a mobile phlebotomist, or using a finger-prick hsCRP card as a proxy for general inflammation monitoring.
How accurate are finger-prick ESR tests?
Finger-prick ESR using validated microcapillary collection devices shows reasonable correlation with standard Westergren results in research settings, but no consumer-grade finger-prick ESR product has full ICSH or FDA clearance for home use as of 2025. Finger-prick hsCRP, by contrast, is well-validated in dried-blood-spot format and correlates with ESR (r approximately 0.65 to 0.75 across published meta-analyses), making it an acceptable proxy for trend monitoring.
What ESR level is considered dangerously high?
An ESR above 100 mm/hr is sometimes called a 'very high ESR' and warrants urgent evaluation. Common causes include giant cell arteritis, multiple myeloma, severe bacterial infection, nephrotic syndrome, and advanced malignancy. Any ESR above 50 mm/hr in a person over age 50 with new headache, visual symptoms, or jaw claudication should prompt same-day evaluation to exclude giant cell arteritis and prevent permanent vision loss.
Does ESR go up with age normally?
Yes. ESR rises with age because fibrinogen and immunoglobulin levels tend to increase over time, and age-related anemia is common. Standard reference ranges adjust for this: the upper limit for men rises from 15 mm/hr (under 50) to 20 mm/hr (over 50), and for women from 20 mm/hr to 30 mm/hr. A rule of thumb sometimes used clinically is: upper normal ESR equals (age in years divided by 2) for men, and (age plus 10, divided by 2) for women.
What is the difference between ESR and CRP?
ESR reflects the combined effect of fibrinogen, immunoglobulins, and other large acute-phase proteins on red cell sedimentation speed. CRP is a specific protein synthesized by the liver in response to IL-6 signaling. CRP responds faster (rises within 6 hours of an acute insult vs. 24 hours for ESR) and returns to normal faster after resolution. ESR stays elevated longer, making it more useful for monitoring chronic or subacute conditions. The two tests are complementary, not interchangeable.
How long does ESR stay elevated after an infection?
ESR typically lags behind clinical recovery. After an acute bacterial infection treated with antibiotics, ESR may remain above normal for 2 to 4 weeks even after the patient feels well and CRP has normalized. This lag reflects the slower turnover of fibrinogen compared with CRP. Retesting ESR less than 4 weeks after an acute illness can produce a falsely elevated result unrelated to any ongoing inflammatory process.
Does ESR change with the menstrual cycle?
ESR rises slightly in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle due to estrogen-driven increases in fibrinogen. The variation is generally 3 to 8 mm/hr and is unlikely to change clinical interpretation in most cases. For maximum reproducibility when tracking trends, collect ESR samples at the same phase of the cycle (e.g., always in the early follicular phase, days 2 to 5).
Can dehydration affect ESR results?
Mild dehydration concentrates plasma proteins including fibrinogen, which could theoretically raise ESR modestly. The effect is generally small in clinical practice, but drinking 500 mL of water in the hour before blood collection is a reasonable precaution for at-home or mail-in testing to ensure accurate hydration status.
Is ESR useful for monitoring hormone therapy?
Exogenous estrogen (oral HRT, combined oral contraceptives) raises fibrinogen and therefore ESR by approximately 3 to 10 mm/hr depending on dose and formulation. Baseline ESR before starting HRT is useful so that any subsequent rise can be interpreted correctly. Transdermal estrogen has a smaller effect on fibrinogen than oral estrogen because it bypasses first-pass hepatic metabolism, per pharmacokinetic data from the ESTHER study.
What other tests should be ordered alongside ESR?
For a complete inflammatory workup, ESR should be paired with hsCRP, fibrinogen, CBC with differential, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. For autoimmune investigation, add ANA, anti-CCP, RF, and complement levels depending on clinical suspicion. For cardiovascular risk stratification, Lp(a), apoB, and homocysteine round out the panel. For longevity monitoring, IL-6 adds sensitivity to detect early cytokine-driven inflammation that ESR and CRP may underestimate.
How often should I repeat an ESR test?
For general inflammation surveillance in a healthy adult, annual testing is reasonable. For active autoimmune disease management, retesting every 4 to 12 weeks mirrors most guideline-based monitoring protocols. For post-acute illness clearance, retest no sooner than 4 weeks after symptom resolution. For patients on a GLP-1 agonist or TRT who are monitoring metabolic inflammation, testing at baseline and again at 3 and 6 months captures the trajectory during the dose-titration period.

References

  1. Dejaco C, Singh YP, Perel P, et al. 2015 Recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1799-1807. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26359488/
  2. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). ICSH recommendations for measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Clin Pathol. 1993;46(3):198-203. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8463413/
  3. Camellino D, Cimmino MA. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: an integrated clinical approach. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(11):ITC81-ITC96. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31766044/
  4. Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, et al. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000;321(7255):199-204. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10903648/
  5. Sox HC, Liang MH. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate: guidelines for rational use. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104(4):515-523. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3954285/
  6. Erikssen G, Liestøl K, Bjørnholt JV, Stormorken H, Thaulow E, Erikssen J. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a possible marker of atherosclerosis and a strong predictor of coronary heart disease mortality. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(19):1614-1620. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10994438/
  7. Hytten F, Chamberlain G. Clinical Physiology in Obstetrics. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1980. Referenced in: Milman N, Graudal N, Nielsen OJ, Agger AO. Serum erythropoietin during normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(7):690-693. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9292649/
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Direct-to-consumer laboratory testing. CDC Laboratory Quality Assurance and Standardization Programs. https://www.cdc.gov/labquality/
  9. Holm RH, Jørgensen HL, Hansen PB, et al. Capillary versus venous blood for inflammatory markers: systematic review. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021;81(4):277-285. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33844614/
  10. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(12):1805-1812. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12813013/
  11. Smith LL. Acute inflammation: the underlying mechanism in delayed onset muscle soreness? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23(5):542-551. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2072832/
  12. Kluft C, Lansink M. Effect of oral contraceptives on haemostasis variables. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77(5):1012-1024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9184429/
  13. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(18):1860-1873. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra041875
  14. Wolfe F, Michaud K. The clinical and research significance of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(6):1227-1237. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7966064/
  15. Gonzalez-Gay MA, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Lopez-Diaz MJ, et al. Epidemiology of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(10):1454-1461. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19790132/
  16. Schiff M, Keiserman M, Codding C, et al. Efficacy and safety of abatacept or infliximab vs placebo in ATTEST: a phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled