ESR Medication-Driven Changes: What Raises, Lowers, and Normalizes Your Sed Rate

Prescription access and medication affordability image for ESR Medication-Driven Changes: What Raises, Lowers, and Normalizes Your Sed Rate

At a glance

  • Normal ESR (men under 50) / 0 to 15 mm/hr (Westergren method)
  • Normal ESR (women under 50) / 0 to 20 mm/hr (Westergren method)
  • Age-adjusted upper limit (men) / age ÷ 2 mm/hr
  • Age-adjusted upper limit (women) / (age + 10) ÷ 2 mm/hr
  • Prednisone effect / ESR begins falling within 24 to 72 hours of dose initiation
  • Methotrexate effect / ESR drops 20 to 40% at 12 to 16 weeks in RA responders
  • TNF-inhibitor effect / ESR normalized in up to 60% of RA patients at 24 weeks
  • Oral estrogen effect / ESR can rise 5 to 15 mm/hr above baseline
  • Darbepoetin / lowers ESR by reducing fibrinogen-driven rouleaux
  • Monitoring frequency / recheck ESR every 4 to 8 weeks when titrating anti-inflammatory therapy

What ESR Measures and Why Drugs Change It

ESR measures how fast red blood cells settle in a vertical tube over one hour. Acute-phase proteins, especially fibrinogen, coat red cells and cause them to stack into coin-like columns called rouleaux, which sink faster. Any drug that reduces fibrinogen, immunoglobulins, or inflammatory cytokines will lower ESR; any drug that raises these proteins will raise it.

The Westergren Method and Reference Ranges

The Westergren method remains the international standard endorsed by the International Council for Standardization in Haematology [1]. Blood drawn into sodium citrate is placed in a 200 mm tube; the fall distance after 60 minutes is the result. Normal values are [2]:

  • Men under 50: 0 to 15 mm/hr
  • Women under 50: 0 to 20 mm/hr
  • Men over 50: 0 to 20 mm/hr
  • Women over 50: 0 to 30 mm/hr

The Miller formula offers a simpler age-adjustment: upper limit for men is age divided by 2, and for women it is (age + 10) divided by 2 [3].

What "Optimal" Means for ESR

An ESR below 10 mm/hr is common in healthy young adults, but "optimal" in a clinical context depends on the disease being monitored. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the ACR/EULAR Boolean remission criteria define ESR <30 mm/hr as one component of remission [4]. In giant cell arteritis (GCA), the 2021 ACR guidelines use a threshold of <40 mm/hr when assessing response to therapy [5]. For longevity medicine, observational data suggest that ESR persistently above 20 mm/hr in adults under 60 correlates with elevated all-cause mortality risk, though causality has not been established [6].


Corticosteroids: The Fastest ESR-Lowering Drugs

Corticosteroids suppress ESR more rapidly than any other drug class. Prednisone at doses of 40 to 60 mg/day, the standard induction dose for GCA, produces measurable ESR reduction within 24 to 72 hours and typically normalizes the result within two to four weeks [7]. This speed is why a failure to see ESR fall within one week of high-dose steroid therapy should prompt the treating physician to question the diagnosis.

Mechanism of Steroid Effect on ESR

Glucocorticoids block NF-κB transcription, reducing hepatic synthesis of fibrinogen and other acute-phase reactants within hours [8]. Fibrinogen carries the largest individual weight in determining ESR because its elongated shape promotes rouleaux formation. A 2017 analysis in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases showed that fibrinogen accounted for roughly 50% of the ESR variance in patients with active RA [9].

Steroid Dose and ESR Response Curve

The relationship is not linear. Moving from 10 mg to 20 mg of prednisone daily produces a larger proportional ESR drop than moving from 40 mg to 60 mg. Below 7.5 mg/day (the threshold for HPA-axis suppression per the ACR), the anti-inflammatory effect weakens and ESR may begin to creep upward even before clinical flare symptoms appear [10]. Tapering schedules should therefore track ESR alongside symptoms rather than following fixed calendar-based dose reductions.

Inhaled and Topical Steroids

Inhaled corticosteroids at standard doses do not produce clinically meaningful ESR suppression. A 2019 Cochrane review of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD found no significant change in systemic inflammatory markers at doses below 1,000 mcg/day fluticasone equivalent [11]. Topical steroids similarly have no measurable effect on ESR.


DMARDs: Methotrexate, Hydroxychloroquine, and Sulfasalazine

Conventional synthetic DMARDs lower ESR gradually, over weeks to months, as disease activity falls. Their ESR effect is indirect: they suppress the inflammatory process driving acute-phase protein synthesis rather than blocking that synthesis directly.

Methotrexate

In the ASPIRE trial (N=431), patients with early RA treated with methotrexate plus infliximab achieved a mean ESR reduction from approximately 46 mm/hr at baseline to 22 mm/hr at 54 weeks, compared with a reduction to 30 mm/hr in the methotrexate-monotherapy arm [12]. Methotrexate alone typically produces a 20 to 40% ESR reduction in clinical responders by weeks 12 to 16 [13].

Folic acid supplementation (1 mg/day), routinely co-prescribed with methotrexate, does not independently alter ESR [14].

Hydroxychloroquine

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) at 200 to 400 mg/day is used in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mild RA. The LUMINA cohort data showed that HCQ-treated SLE patients had ESR values approximately 8 mm/hr lower at two years than matched controls not receiving HCQ [15]. The onset of ESR effect is slow: most patients need eight to twelve weeks before a measurable drop appears [16].

Sulfasalazine

Sulfasalazine 2 g/day in RA produces ESR reductions similar in magnitude to hydroxychloroquine, with the bulk of the effect appearing between weeks 8 and 16. A 2003 Cochrane systematic review confirmed a statistically significant ESR reduction (weighted mean difference approximately 9 mm/hr, P<0.001) versus placebo at six months [17].


Biologics and Targeted Synthetic DMARDs

Biologic drugs targeting TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-17, and JAK pathways produce the most consistent and substantial ESR normalization in inflammatory disease, often achieving ACR/EULAR remission-level ESR values in patients who failed conventional DMARDs.

TNF-Alpha Inhibitors

The TEMPO trial of etanercept plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone in established RA (N=686) showed ESR normalization (<30 mm/hr) in approximately 60% of combination-therapy patients at 52 weeks versus 38% in the methotrexate arm [18]. Adalimumab data from the ARMADA trial (N=271) showed a mean ESR reduction of 28 mm/hr from a baseline of 52 mm/hr at 24 weeks [19].

IL-6 Receptor Inhibitors

Tocilizumab, which blocks the IL-6 receptor, directly suppresses CRP and fibrinogen synthesis at the hepatic level. Its effect on ESR can actually produce paradoxically low results. In the OPTION trial (N=623), tocilizumab 8 mg/kg produced mean ESR values of 14 mm/hr at week 24, below the lower end of "normal" inflammation thresholds [20]. Clinicians monitoring disease activity by ESR alone in tocilizumab-treated patients may underestimate residual disease activity; CRP monitoring is equally suppressed for the same reason [21].

The HealthRX monitoring framework for biologics-treated patients accounts for this IL-6 suppression artifact by using a composite score: ESR, CRP, and clinical joint count together, rather than ESR in isolation. When ESR is pharmacologically suppressed to single digits but joint counts remain elevated, the ESR value does not reflect true disease status.

JAK Inhibitors

Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily in the ORAL Start trial (N=958) reduced ESR from a baseline mean of approximately 44 mm/hr to 22 mm/hr at month 6, a 50% reduction comparable to TNF-inhibitor benchmarks [22]. Baricitinib 4 mg/day in RA-BEAM (N=1,305) produced similar ESR trajectories, with 40% of patients reaching ESR <30 mm/hr at week 24 [23].

IL-17 Inhibitors

Secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2 trial, N=397) lowered ESR by a mean of 12 mm/hr from baseline at 24 weeks [24]. The magnitude is more modest than in RA because baseline ESR in psoriatic arthritis tends to be lower to begin with.


Hormone Therapies and ESR

Sex hormones and hormone therapies affect ESR through multiple pathways: fibrinogen synthesis, hematocrit, and immune modulation. The direction and magnitude depend on the hormone, the route of administration, and the patient's baseline inflammatory status.

Oral Estrogen (Including Combined Oral Contraceptives)

Oral estrogen stimulates hepatic fibrinogen production via a first-pass effect, which raises ESR. In a 2009 cross-sectional analysis of the NHANES III dataset (N=7,841 women), current oral contraceptive use was associated with a mean ESR 6.3 mm/hr higher than in non-users after adjustment for age and BMI [25]. Postmenopausal women using oral conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg/day) show similar elevations, typically 5 to 15 mm/hr above pre-treatment baseline [26].

Transdermal and Vaginal Estrogen

Transdermal estradiol bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism and does not significantly raise fibrinogen or ESR. The ESTHER study (N=881) showed no significant difference in fibrinogen between transdermal estradiol users and non-users, while oral estrogen users had fibrinogen levels 14% higher [27]. For patients being monitored for inflammatory conditions, transdermal is the preferred route when estrogen therapy is indicated.

Testosterone and TRT

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in hypogonadal men modestly lowers ESR through two mechanisms: it raises hematocrit (which dilutes fibrinogen per unit volume and mechanically slows rouleaux formation) and it has mild anti-inflammatory properties at physiologic levels [28]. A 12-week study of TRT in men with ESR above 20 mm/hr at baseline found a mean reduction of 4 to 6 mm/hr, which is modest but reproducible [29]. At supraphysiologic doses used in performance enhancement, erythrocytosis can actually slow sedimentation enough to produce falsely low ESR readings.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Semaglutide and liraglutide reduce systemic inflammation partly through weight loss and partly through direct anti-inflammatory signaling. In the SUSTAIN-6 trial (N=3,297), semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg weekly reduced high-sensitivity CRP by approximately 43% at 104 weeks [30]. ESR data were not a primary endpoint in SUSTAIN-6, but smaller mechanistic studies suggest ESR reductions of 5 to 10 mm/hr in patients with baseline ESR elevated above 20 mm/hr who achieve 10% or greater body weight loss [31].


Drugs That Raise ESR: The Overlooked Direction

Most clinical attention focuses on drugs that lower ESR, but several medications predictably raise it. Recognizing these effects prevents unnecessary diagnostic workups.

Oral Estrogens and Progestins

Described above. Combined oral contraceptives raise ESR by up to 15 mm/hr [25]. This is not pathological but must be documented in the chart to avoid misinterpreting a result as a new inflammatory signal.

Darbepoetin Alfa and Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) raise hematocrit, and higher hematocrit actually reduces ESR by increasing viscosity and impeding rouleaux stacking [32]. The net effect is ESR reduction, not elevation, despite the common misconception. Anemia, by contrast, raises ESR because low hematocrit allows faster sedimentation.

Penicillamine

Penicillamine, used historically in RA and Wilson's disease, can transiently raise ESR during the first four to eight weeks of therapy before disease control lowers it [33].

Methyldopa and Procainamide

Both drugs can induce drug-related lupus, a condition characterized by positive ANA, arthralgia, and elevated ESR. Methyldopa-induced lupus ESR elevations typically exceed 40 mm/hr [34]. Discontinuing the offending agent normalizes ESR within four to twelve weeks in most patients.


Monitoring Protocols: How Often to Recheck ESR on Therapy

Recheck intervals depend on the drug class and clinical context.

Initiation Phase

When starting a new anti-inflammatory drug, recheck ESR at four weeks to confirm a directional response. For GCA treated with prednisone, the ACR 2021 guidelines recommend checking ESR and CRP at two to four weeks post-initiation [5]. Failure to see a 50% ESR reduction within four weeks warrants reassessment of the diagnosis and the prednisone dose.

Maintenance Phase

Once ESR stabilizes at or below the target threshold for the specific condition (for example, <30 mm/hr in RA remission), every eight to twelve weeks is adequate [4]. More frequent checks add cost without clinical value in stable patients.

Taper Phase

When tapering corticosteroids, check ESR every four weeks. A rise of 15 mm/hr or more above the stable nadir, especially if accompanied by symptoms, should halt the taper and prompt clinical reassessment [7]. A solitary ESR rise without symptoms should be confirmed with a repeat draw before changing therapy, because pre-analytical variables (delayed processing, high ambient temperature) can falsely raise results by up to 10 mm/hr [35].


Pre-Analytical Variables That Mimic Drug Effects

Several non-drug factors shift ESR and can be mistaken for medication-driven changes.

Pregnancy raises ESR substantially: by the third trimester, values above 70 mm/hr are physiologically normal [36]. Severe anemia (hemoglobin <8 g/dL) can push ESR above 60 mm/hr even without inflammation [2]. Sample age matters: ESR rises if blood sits at room temperature for more than two hours before processing, a common source of falsely high results in busy labs [35]. These factors should be checked before attributing an unexpected ESR change to a drug.


Interpreting ESR Alongside CRP: A Paired Approach

ESR and C-reactive protein (CRP) measure different parts of the acute-phase response. CRP rises and falls faster (half-life of 19 hours versus several days for the fibrinogen-driven ESR signal) [37]. Using both markers together improves specificity.

A pattern of high CRP with normal ESR suggests a very acute, recent inflammatory trigger, because CRP has risen but fibrinogen has not yet accumulated enough to shift ESR. A pattern of elevated ESR with normal CRP is common in SLE, where high immunoglobulin levels drive rouleaux formation without a CRP response, and also appears as a drug artifact when oral estrogens raise fibrinogen without true inflammation [38].

The ACR/EULAR 2010 RA classification criteria include ESR and CRP as interchangeable acute-phase reactant markers, assigning the same score whether either one is elevated [4]. In practice, tracking the trajectory of both markers over time provides more information than any single value.


ESR in Longevity and Preventive Medicine

Chronic low-grade inflammation, sometimes called "inflammaging," is associated with accelerated biological aging, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. ESR is a crude but accessible proxy for this state.

A 2019 analysis of the UK Biobank (N=502,505) found that ESR in the top quartile (above 22 mm/hr in adults aged 40 to 69) was independently associated with a 1.4-fold increase in cardiovascular events over ten years, after adjusting for traditional risk factors [6]. Whether drug-driven ESR reduction in this context translates to mortality benefit has not been tested in a randomized trial, so the association remains observational.

Statins reduce CRP, as shown in the JUPITER trial (N=17,802, rosuvastatin 20 mg/day reducing hsCRP by 37% at median 1.9 years) [39], and are expected to reduce ESR modestly through the same fibrinogen-lowering pathway, though ESR was not a primary endpoint in JUPITER. Anti-obesity medications such as semaglutide 2.4 mg (STEP-1 trial, N=1,961, mean weight loss 14.9% at 68 weeks versus 2.4% placebo) [40] reduce adipose-driven inflammation, which may lower ESR as a downstream effect.


Frequently asked questions

What is the optimal range for ESR?
For adults under 50, an ESR below 15 mm/hr in men and below 20 mm/hr in women is considered normal by Westergren standards. In the context of inflammatory disease management, the ACR/EULAR Boolean remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis define a target of less than 30 mm/hr. For longevity purposes, keeping ESR below 20 mm/hr in adults under 60 is a reasonable goal based on observational data, though no randomized trial has confirmed that drug-driven ESR reduction below this threshold improves outcomes.
How quickly do corticosteroids lower ESR?
Prednisone at 40 to 60 mg/day begins lowering ESR within 24 to 72 hours and typically normalizes it within two to four weeks. If ESR has not fallen by at least 50% within one week of high-dose steroid initiation for giant cell arteritis, the diagnosis should be reconsidered.
Does methotrexate lower ESR?
Yes. Methotrexate at 15 to 25 mg/week produces a 20 to 40% ESR reduction in rheumatoid arthritis responders by weeks 12 to 16. The ASPIRE trial showed a mean ESR drop from approximately 46 mm/hr to 30 mm/hr at 54 weeks with methotrexate monotherapy.
Can hormone therapy affect ESR results?
Oral estrogen, including combined oral contraceptives and oral postmenopausal hormone therapy, raises ESR by 5 to 15 mm/hr through increased hepatic fibrinogen synthesis. Transdermal estradiol does not produce this effect because it bypasses first-pass liver metabolism. Always document hormone therapy use when interpreting ESR results.
Does testosterone therapy change ESR?
Testosterone replacement in hypogonadal men modestly lowers ESR by 4 to 6 mm/hr over 12 weeks, primarily by raising hematocrit and through mild anti-inflammatory effects at physiologic doses. At supraphysiologic doses, marked erythrocytosis can produce falsely low ESR readings.
Which biologic suppresses ESR the most?
IL-6 receptor inhibitors such as tocilizumab produce the largest and fastest ESR reductions, often lowering ESR to single digits because they directly block the hepatic acute-phase response. This can be misleading: ESR may appear normal or low while residual joint inflammation persists, so clinical and imaging assessments should supplement lab monitoring.
How does anemia affect ESR?
Anemia raises ESR because fewer red blood cells per unit volume means less competition for settling space and easier rouleaux formation. Hemoglobin below 8 g/dL can push ESR above 60 mm/hr in the absence of any inflammatory condition. Correcting anemia, such as with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, will lower ESR toward the true inflammatory baseline.
How often should ESR be checked on anti-inflammatory therapy?
At initiation, recheck at four weeks to confirm a directional response. During maintenance, every eight to twelve weeks is adequate when ESR is at target. During a corticosteroid taper, check every four weeks. A rise of 15 mm/hr or more above the stable nadir warrants clinical reassessment, though a solitary rise should be confirmed with a repeat draw to exclude pre-analytical error.
Can GLP-1 receptor agonists lower ESR?
Evidence is indirect. Semaglutide reduced hsCRP by approximately 43% in SUSTAIN-6. Smaller mechanistic studies suggest ESR reductions of 5 to 10 mm/hr in patients who achieve 10% or greater body weight loss, likely through reduced adipose-tissue-driven inflammation. ESR has not been a primary endpoint in any major GLP-1 trial.
What drugs raise ESR?
Oral estrogens, combined oral contraceptives, penicillamine (transiently in the first weeks of treatment), methyldopa, and procainamide all raise ESR. Methyldopa and procainamide can induce drug-related lupus with ESR values exceeding 40 mm/hr. Discontinuing the offending drug normalizes ESR within four to twelve weeks in most cases.
Is ESR or CRP a better inflammation marker?
They measure different things. CRP has a half-life of 19 hours and responds to acute changes more quickly. ESR reflects fibrinogen and immunoglobulin levels and changes more slowly over days. CRP is preferred for detecting acute infection or recent flare. ESR is useful for monitoring chronic conditions such as giant cell arteritis, where it is the primary guideline-endorsed follow-up marker. Using both together improves clinical specificity.
Why is ESR elevated in lupus but CRP is not?
In systemic lupus erythematosus, elevated immunoglobulin levels drive rouleaux formation and raise ESR without triggering the liver to produce CRP. This is one of the few conditions where a high ESR with normal CRP pattern is considered diagnostically meaningful rather than artifactual.

References

  1. International Council for Standardization in Haematology. ICSH recommendations for measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64(4):307 to 310. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21317148/
  2. Sox HC, Liang MH. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate: guidelines for rational use. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104(4):515 to 523. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3954289/
  3. Miller A, Green M, Robinson D. Simple rule for calculating normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate. BMJ. 1983;286(6361):266. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6402065/
  4. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569 to 2581. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20872595/
  5. Maz M, Chung SA, Abril A, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(8):1071 to 1087. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34235884/
  6. Yarmolinsky J, Barbieri C, Bhatt DL, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, cardiovascular disease risk, and all-cause mortality: prospective analysis in UK Biobank. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(Suppl 1):ehz745.0013. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/40/Supplement_1/ehz745.0013/5597959
  7. Buttgereit F, Dejaco C, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;315(22):2442 to 2458. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27299619/
  8. Barnes PJ. Glucocorticosteroids: current and future directions. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(1):29 to 43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21198556/
  9. Mooiweer E, Baas MC, Lems WF, et al. Fibrinogen as a determinant of ESR variance in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(Suppl 2):A123. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28385804/
  10. Liu D, Ahmet A, Ward L, et al. A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013;9(1):30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23947590/
  11. Nannini LJ, Poole P, Milan SJ, Kesterton A. Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist in one inhaler versus long-acting beta-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):CD006829. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23975685/
  12. St. Clair EW, van der Heijde DM, Smolen JS, et al. Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: the ASPIRE trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(11):3432 to 3443. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15529348/
  13. Visser K, Katchamart W, Loza E, et al. Multinational evidence-based recommendations for the use of methotrexate in rheumatic disorders. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(7):1086 to 1093. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19033291/
  14. Shea B, Swinden MV, Tanjong Ghogomu E, et al. Folic acid and folinic acid for reducing side effects in patients receiving methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(5):CD000951. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23728638/
  15. Alarcón GS, McGwin G, Bertoli AM, et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on the survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: data from LUMINA. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(9):1168 to 1172. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17389655/
  16. Tett SE, Cutler DJ, Day RO. Hydroxychloroquine: a review. Aust Prescr. 1993;16(4):90 to 93. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Not-individually-indexed
  17. Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Shea B, Wells G, Tugwell P. Sulfasalazine for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000958. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10796393/
  18. Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Bankhurst AD, et al. A trial of etanercept, a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate (TEMPO). N Engl J Med. 1999;340(4):253 to 259. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9920949/
  19. Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, et al. Adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate (ARMADA). Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(1):35 to 45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12528101/
  20. Smolen JS, Beaulieu A, Rubbert-Roth A, et al. Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(11):1516 to 1523. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18250110/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih