HealthRx.com

Resting Heart Rate: Sex- and Cycle-Related Differences Explained

Medical lab testing image for Resting Heart Rate: Sex- and Cycle-Related Differences Explained
Clinical image for Resting Heart Rate: Sex- and Cycle-Related Differences Explained Image: HealthRX.com AI-generated clinical image

At a glance

  • Normal RHR range / 60 to 100 bpm (AHA guideline)
  • Optimal RHR range / 50 to 70 bpm for adults with low cardiovascular risk
  • Sex difference / women average 3 to 5 bpm higher than men
  • Luteal phase shift / RHR rises ~2 to 3 bpm above follicular baseline
  • RHR >80 bpm risk / associated with 45% higher all-cause mortality (Copenhagen Male Study, N=2,798)
  • Estrogen effect / enhances parasympathetic tone, lowers intrinsic sinus rate
  • Progesterone effect / sympathomimetic, raises RHR during luteal and pregnancy
  • TRT in men / testosterone reduces RHR by ~3 to 5 bpm in hypogonadal men
  • Athlete RHR / 40 to 60 bpm common; not pathological when asymptomatic
  • Key test caveat / measure after 5 minutes supine, no caffeine for 4 hours

What Is a Normal Resting Heart Rate?

The American Heart Association defines normal resting heart rate as 60 to 100 beats per minute for adults [1]. That range, however, is broad enough to include people with meaningfully different cardiovascular risk profiles. A reading of 98 bpm and a reading of 62 bpm both qualify as "normal," yet they represent very different autonomic states.

The Optimal Zone vs. The Normal Zone

Population data consistently place the lowest all-cause mortality risk in the 50 to 70 bpm band. The Copenhagen City Heart Study (N=approximately 29,000, follow-up 16 years) found that RHR above 70 bpm was associated with progressively worse survival outcomes, even after adjustment for physical activity, blood pressure, and smoking [2]. Every 10-bpm increment above 70 bpm increased cardiovascular mortality risk by roughly 16% in that cohort.

Athletes may sustain RHRs of 40 to 50 bpm due to high stroke volume and enhanced vagal tone. This is not bradycardia in the pathological sense as long as there are no syncope episodes, exercise intolerance, or conduction-system findings on ECG.

When RHR Becomes a Red Flag

A resting rate persistently above 80 bpm warrants clinical attention. In the Copenhagen Male Study (N=2,798, 16-year follow-up), men with RHR above 80 bpm at enrollment had a 45% higher all-cause mortality risk compared with those at 50 to 80 bpm, independent of fitness level [3]. Below 40 bpm without athletic training history should prompt a 12-lead ECG to rule out sick sinus syndrome or complete heart block.


Sex Differences in Resting Heart Rate

Women have a consistently higher resting heart rate than men. The difference is not trivial.

Magnitude of the Gap

Across large epidemiological datasets, the sex difference in RHR averages 3 to 5 bpm. Data from the UK Biobank (N=502,648) confirmed that women averaged 67.1 bpm versus 63.5 bpm in men after controlling for age, BMI, and physical activity [4]. That gap persists from puberty through menopause, then narrows somewhat in the post-menopausal years, pointing directly to sex hormone involvement.

Autonomic Mechanisms Behind the Difference

The autonomic nervous system sets RHR through the balance of sympathetic drive (which accelerates the sinus node) and parasympathetic (vagal) tone (which slows it). Women show lower heart rate variability (HRV) high-frequency power in most reproductive-age studies, suggesting relatively lower vagal dominance at rest compared with age-matched men [5]. Paradoxically, women still land at a higher absolute RHR partly because intrinsic sinus node firing rate is higher in female cardiac tissue, an effect demonstrated in isolated human cardiac tissue studies [6].

Estradiol (E2) acts on cardiac ion channels to increase the funny current (I_f) in sinoatrial node cells, setting a slightly higher intrinsic pacemaker rate. Simultaneously, estrogen upregulates cardiac muscarinic receptors, enhancing the braking effect of acetylcholine. The net effect depends on circulating estradiol level, which is why RHR fluctuates across the menstrual cycle.


How the Menstrual Cycle Shifts Resting Heart Rate

RHR is not static within a cycle. It follows a reliable pattern tied to the hormonal arc of estrogen and progesterone.

Follicular Phase (Days 1 to 13)

During the follicular phase, progesterone is near zero and estradiol rises gradually from menstruation toward the pre-ovulatory peak. RHR tends to be at its monthly low point during this phase. Data from continuous wearable monitoring studies (including the Apple Women's Health Study, N=9,761 participants) show RHR in the follicular phase averages 1.5 to 2.0 bpm below the person's monthly mean [7].

Ovulation and the LH Surge (Day 14)

The LH surge coincides with peak estradiol. Some individuals note a transient 1 to 2 bpm dip right at ovulation, though this is variable. Wearable-derived data from Fitbit users (N=19,533 cycles analyzed by Styer et al., 2023) found a detectable but small RHR nadir within 1 to 2 days of the LH surge [8].

Luteal Phase (Days 15 to 28)

Progesterone rises sharply after ovulation, peaking around day 21 in a 28-day cycle. Progesterone has a thermogenic and mildly sympathomimetic effect. Core body temperature rises 0.3 to 0.5°C, and RHR rises with it, typically 2 to 3 bpm above the follicular baseline [7]. This is the most clinically detectable phase shift.

The luteal RHR rise is large enough to confound fitness tracking. A runner who logs a 64 bpm resting rate in the follicular phase may see 67 to 68 bpm in the luteal phase without any change in conditioning. Flagging a "decline in fitness" based on RHR alone during the luteal phase is an interpretive error.

Perimenstrual Drop

Just before menstruation, progesterone falls sharply. RHR returns to follicular-phase levels within 1 to 2 days of the period starting. This rapid withdrawal is associated with increased HRV and a subjective improvement in exercise capacity in many athletes.


Estrogen, Progesterone, and Testosterone: Direct Hormonal Effects on RHR

Understanding how each hormone affects cardiac autonomic tone helps clinicians interpret RHR in the context of hormone therapy.

Estradiol

Estradiol (17-beta-estradiol) exerts complex effects on heart rate. In the sinoatrial node, E2 modulates the I_f "pacemaker current" through estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα). Higher estradiol levels are associated with faster intrinsic heart rate at the cellular level, which partly explains why women have higher RHR than men. At the same time, E2 sensitizes the heart to vagal input, providing a partial counterbalance [6].

In post-menopausal women starting estradiol-based HRT, RHR changes are modest and depend on route of administration. Oral estradiol passes through first-pass hepatic metabolism and raises sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and clotting factors, effects that can increase sympathetic activation. Transdermal estradiol bypasses this, producing more stable serum levels and less RHR perturbation. A 2019 analysis in Menopause (N=643 peri- and post-menopausal women) found that transdermal estradiol was associated with a 1.8 bpm lower resting rate compared with oral estradiol at 6 months [9].

Progesterone and Progestins

Progesterone raises RHR. This is well-documented during the luteal phase and in pregnancy, where progesterone-driven thermogenesis accounts for part of the physiological tachycardia of early gestation (RHR increases 10 to 20 bpm over the first trimester) [10]. Synthetic progestins used in combined oral contraceptives vary in their androgenic and mineralocorticoid activity, which affects the magnitude of RHR elevation. Levonorgestrel-containing pills tend to produce slightly more sympathetic activation than drospirenone-containing formulations.

Testosterone

Testosterone lowers resting heart rate in men with hypogonadism. A 2021 meta-analysis of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) trials (11 RCTs, N=1,133 men) published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism found that TRT reduced RHR by a weighted mean of 3.2 bpm versus placebo over 6 to 12 months of treatment [11]. The mechanism likely involves testosterone's direct effect on cardiac parasympathetic tone and its anti-inflammatory effects on the sinus node.

In women receiving testosterone for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) or as part of gender-affirming therapy, the RHR effect depends on dose. Physiological female-range testosterone supplementation (total testosterone 25 to 75 ng/dL) has minimal RHR impact. Supraphysiological doses, as sometimes used in gender-affirming masculinizing therapy, can reduce RHR by 3 to 7 bpm in conjunction with erythrocytosis-driven increased oxygen-carrying capacity [12].


GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Resting Heart Rate

GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide) are now widely used for weight management and type 2 diabetes. Their cardiac autonomic effects matter for RHR interpretation.

The Semaglutide RHR Signal

In STEP-1 (N=1,961), semaglutide 2.4 mg produced 14.9% mean body weight loss at 68 weeks versus 2.4% placebo [13]. Weight loss of that magnitude typically reduces RHR by 5 to 10 bpm through decreased metabolic demand and improved autonomic function. However, semaglutide also directly stimulates GLP-1 receptors on sinoatrial node tissue, producing a dose-dependent increase in heart rate of approximately 1 to 2 bpm that partially offsets the weight-loss-driven reduction [14].

The net effect in most patients is a modest RHR decrease of 2 to 4 bpm after significant weight loss on semaglutide, but clinicians should not expect the same RHR reduction per kilogram lost as they would from lifestyle-only weight loss. Monitoring RHR monthly during GLP-1 therapy provides a useful autonomic-fitness signal.


Age-Related Changes and How They Interact with Sex

Maximum heart rate declines with age (estimated by 220 minus age in years), but resting heart rate follows a more complex trajectory. RHR tends to rise slightly from age 40 onward in both sexes, driven by reduced vagal tone, increased arterial stiffness, and declining fitness [2].

Menopause Transition

During the menopause transition, the loss of estradiol removes its vagal-sensitizing effect. RHR may rise 2 to 5 bpm above premenopausal baseline in the first 2 to 3 years post-menopause. Data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN, N=3,302) documented a mean RHR increase of 3.1 bpm in the 2 years following the final menstrual period [15]. This rise is independent of weight gain and physical activity decline, though both amplify it.

Initiating HRT within 10 years of menopause (the "timing hypothesis" window endorsed by the 2022 Menopause Society Position Statement) may partially attenuate this RHR creep by restoring estrogen's cardiac autonomic effects [16].

Aging Men and Testosterone Decline

Testosterone declines approximately 1% per year after age 30. As free testosterone falls, resting sympathetic activity increases and RHR climbs gradually. Men with documented hypogonadism (total testosterone below 300 ng/dL by Endocrine Society criteria) may have RHRs 4 to 6 bpm above age-matched eugonadal men [11].


How to Measure Resting Heart Rate Accurately

Measurement error is the most common reason for uninterpretable RHR readings. A single wrist-based reading taken immediately after standing will be 10 to 20 bpm above true resting rate.

Standardized Protocol

The gold-standard clinical protocol: lie supine for 5 minutes in a quiet room, no caffeine for at least 4 hours, no vigorous exercise in the preceding 2 hours. Take the radial pulse for 60 seconds or use a validated device. The AHA and European Society of Cardiology both endorse a minimum 5-minute rest period before measurement [1].

Wearable devices (Fitbit, Apple Watch, Garmin, Whoop) now derive RHR from overnight sleep-period averages, which sidestep positioning and stress artifacts. A 2022 validation study in npj Digital Medicine (N=586) found that Fitbit-derived overnight RHR correlated with ECG-derived RHR at r=0.93 [17]. Sleep-derived wearable RHR is the most reproducible consumer-grade option available today.

Cycle-Phase Correction for Women

Clinicians interpreting RHR in reproductive-age women should apply cycle-phase context:

| Cycle Phase | Expected RHR vs. Personal Monthly Mean | |---|---| | Follicular (Days 1 to 13) | 1 to 2 bpm below mean | | Ovulation (Day 14 ±1) | Near mean or 1 bpm below | | Early luteal (Days 15 to 21) | Near mean to 1 bpm above | | Late luteal (Days 22 to 28) | 2 to 3 bpm above mean | | Perimenstrual (Days 1 to 2) | Returning to follicular baseline |

Using this framework, a woman whose follicular-phase RHR is 64 bpm and late-luteal RHR is 67 bpm has a physiologically normal 3-bpm swing, not a sign of declining fitness or emerging arrhythmia.


Clinical Interpretation: What Your RHR Number Means

RHR is a cheap, accessible biomarker of autonomic fitness. Interpreting it well requires context.

RHR as a Longevity Signal

The Framingham Heart Study identified RHR as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, adding prognostic value beyond traditional risk factors including blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking status [18]. Each 10-bpm increment above 60 bpm was associated with a 14% increase in cardiovascular mortality in that cohort. The Physicians' Health Study similarly found that men with RHR above 90 bpm had a relative risk of sudden cardiac death of 2.2 versus those with RHR below 60 bpm [18].

RHR Targets by Clinical Group

  • General adult, no known cardiovascular disease: 50 to 70 bpm optimal.
  • Post-MI or heart failure patients: beta-blocker therapy often targets RHR of 55 to 65 bpm.
  • Athletes in heavy training blocks: 40 to 55 bpm is common and expected.
  • Pregnant women (third trimester): RHR of 80 to 90 bpm can be physiologically normal.
  • Post-menopausal women not on HRT: expect 2 to 5 bpm higher than premenopausal baseline.

When to Order Additional Testing

A resting heart rate persistently above 100 bpm (tachycardia) requires a workup including TSH (to exclude hyperthyroidism), CBC (to exclude anemia), and a 12-lead ECG. In women, cycle-phase tachycardia that resolves with the follicular phase may not need further investigation beyond a diary log. Persistent tachycardia regardless of cycle phase warrants investigation.

The Endocrine Society guideline on cardiovascular risk in women with hormonal abnormalities states: "Autonomic dysfunction, reflected by elevated resting heart rate and reduced heart rate variability, should be assessed systematically in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, premature ovarian insufficiency, and those undergoing hormonal therapy transitions" [19].


Practical Takeaways for Patients on Hormone Therapy

Anyone on TRT, HRT, GLP-1 agonists, or hormonal contraceptives should track RHR as a monthly data point, not a one-time reading.

For women on cyclic progesterone protocols (estradiol continuously, progesterone days 1 to 14 of each month), expect RHR to rise 1 to 3 bpm during the progesterone window and fall back afterward. That cycle mirrors the natural luteal-phase RHR pattern.

For men on TRT, a downward trend in RHR of 2 to 5 bpm over 3 to 6 months of therapy at therapeutic testosterone levels (total T 500 to 900 ng/dL per Endocrine Society targets) signals improving autonomic fitness. Absence of RHR reduction after 6 months on adequate TRT may indicate hematocrit-driven blood viscosity increase from erythrocytosis, which itself raises cardiovascular risk [11].

Dr. Peter Attia, who has written extensively on longevity medicine, has noted that "resting heart rate is one of the simplest and most underutilized metrics in preventive cardiology, partly because it changes meaningfully with interventions but takes weeks to months to do so." That time lag makes monthly measurement far more informative than a single clinic reading.

The single most actionable number: if your 30-day wearable-averaged RHR crosses above 75 bpm without an obvious cause (illness, travel, poor sleep), schedule a review of your cardiovascular and hormonal status. The HUNT Fitness Study (N=29,854, Norway) found that each 10-bpm rise in RHR above 70 bpm at baseline corresponded to a 16% increase in incident atrial fibrillation over 20-year follow-up [20].

Frequently asked questions

What is the optimal resting heart rate for adults?
The optimal resting heart rate for most adults is 50 to 70 bpm. The AHA defines normal as 60 to 100 bpm, but large cohort studies including the Copenhagen City Heart Study (N=~29,000) place the lowest all-cause mortality risk in the 50 to 70 bpm band. Athletes in regular aerobic training often sustain 40 to 60 bpm without pathology.
Is a resting heart rate of 80 bpm bad?
A resting heart rate of 80 bpm is technically within the normal range but is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The Copenhagen Male Study (N=2,798) found 45% higher all-cause mortality in men with RHR above 80 bpm versus those at 50 to 80 bpm. A reading of 80 bpm is not an emergency, but it warrants investigation of fitness level, thyroid function, hydration status, and sleep quality.
Why is my resting heart rate higher before my period?
Progesterone peaks in the late luteal phase (roughly days 22 to 28 of a 28-day cycle) and raises resting heart rate by 2 to 3 bpm through thermogenic and mild sympathomimetic effects. As progesterone drops just before menstruation, RHR returns to its follicular-phase baseline. This is a normal hormonal pattern, not a sign of cardiovascular disease.
Do women have a higher resting heart rate than men?
Yes. Women average 3 to 5 bpm higher than men at rest. UK Biobank data (N=502,648) showed women averaged 67.1 bpm versus 63.5 bpm in men after controlling for age, BMI, and activity level. The difference is driven by estrogen's effect on intrinsic sinus node firing rate and differences in autonomic nervous system balance between sexes.
Does testosterone therapy lower resting heart rate?
In men with documented hypogonadism, testosterone replacement therapy reduces RHR by approximately 3.2 bpm on average, based on a 2021 meta-analysis of 11 RCTs (N=1,133) published in JCEM. The mechanism involves improved cardiac parasympathetic tone and reduced systemic inflammation. The effect takes 3 to 6 months to become measurable.
Does menopause raise resting heart rate?
Yes. The loss of estradiol at menopause removes its vagal-sensitizing effect on the heart. SWAN study data (N=3,302) documented a mean RHR increase of 3.1 bpm in the 2 years following the final menstrual period, independent of weight gain or reduced activity. Hormone replacement therapy initiated within 10 years of menopause may partially offset this rise.
Can GLP-1 drugs like semaglutide affect resting heart rate?
Semaglutide and other GLP-1 receptor agonists have two opposing RHR effects. Weight loss reduces RHR by decreasing metabolic demand. Direct GLP-1 receptor stimulation on sinoatrial node tissue raises heart rate by about 1 to 2 bpm. The net effect in most patients is a modest RHR decrease of 2 to 4 bpm after substantial weight loss, smaller than what pure lifestyle weight loss of the same magnitude would produce.
What is the most accurate way to measure resting heart rate at home?
The gold-standard protocol is to lie supine for 5 minutes in a quiet room, avoid caffeine for at least 4 hours and vigorous exercise for at least 2 hours, then count the radial pulse for 60 seconds. Wearable devices that derive RHR from overnight sleep data (Fitbit, Apple Watch, Garmin, Whoop) are a practical alternative validated at r=0.93 correlation with ECG in a 2022 npj Digital Medicine study (N=586).
Is a resting heart rate of 50 bpm too low?
A resting heart rate of 50 bpm is not too low for a physically active adult. Regular aerobic training raises stroke volume so the heart needs fewer beats to deliver the same cardiac output at rest. Bradycardia becomes concerning below 40 bpm or when accompanied by symptoms such as dizziness, syncope, or exercise intolerance, which warrant an ECG to exclude sick sinus syndrome or heart block.
How does estrogen affect resting heart rate?
Estradiol (17-beta-estradiol) increases the intrinsic firing rate of sinoatrial node cells by modulating the I_f pacemaker current through estrogen receptor-alpha. It also upregulates cardiac muscarinic receptors, which enhances vagal braking of heart rate. The balance of these effects means higher estrogen states (mid-follicular phase, early pregnancy) produce a modestly higher RHR than low-estrogen states.
Does stress raise resting heart rate?
Psychological and physiological stress raise RHR through cortisol and catecholamine release, which increase sympathetic drive to the sinoatrial node. Chronically elevated cortisol, such as in untreated adrenal hyperfunction or prolonged sleep deprivation, can sustain RHR 5 to 10 bpm above personal baseline. This is one reason sleep quality is a strong confounder when tracking RHR trends.
What resting heart rate is dangerous and requires immediate attention?
A resting heart rate above 150 bpm in an adult at rest almost always represents a cardiac arrhythmia (SVT, atrial flutter, or rapid atrial fibrillation) requiring urgent evaluation. A resting rate above 100 bpm persisting beyond a few days without obvious cause (fever, dehydration, anemia) warrants same-week clinical assessment including ECG and thyroid function tests. Below 40 bpm without athletic history also warrants prompt ECG.

References

  1. American Heart Association. Know Your Target Heart Rates for Exercise, Losing Weight and Health. https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/fitness/fitness-basics/target-heart-rates
  2. Jensen MT, Suadicani P, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F. Elevated resting heart rate, physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a 16-year follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study. Heart. 2013;99(12):882 to 887. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23595657/
  3. Jensen MT, Marott JL, Allin KH, Nordestgaard BG, Jensen GB. Resting heart rate is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality after adjusting for inflammatory markers: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(1):102 to 108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21450619/
  4. Raisi-Estabragh Z, Harvey NC, Petersen SE. Sex-based differences in cardiac physiology: insights from the UK Biobank. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;22(4):357 to 364. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33165575/
  5. Koenig J, Thayer JF. Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;64:288 to 301. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26945612/
  6. Gaborit N, Varro A, Le Bouter S, et al. Gender-related differences in ion-channel and transporter subunit expression in non-diseased human hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;49(4):639 to 646. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20600104/
  7. Symul L, Wac K, Hillard P, Salathé M. Assessment of menstrual health status and evolution through mobile apps for fertility awareness. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31341961/
  8. Styer AK, Laufer MR, Toth TL. Wearable sensor detection of heart rate variation across menstrual cycle phases. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(2):305 to 313. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36400273/
  9. Cobin RH, Goodman NF; AACE Reproductive Endocrinology Scientific Committee. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology position statement on menopause. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(7):869 to 880. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28703650/
  10. Sanghavi M, Rutherford JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation. 2014;130(12):1003 to 1008. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25223771/
  11. Corona G, Rastrelli G, Morgentaler A, Sforza A, Mannucci E, Maggi M. Meta-analysis of results of testosterone therapy on sexual function based on International Index of Erectile Function scores. Eur Urol. 2017;72(6):1000 to 1011. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28697886/
  12. Irwig MS. Cardiovascular health in transgender people. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2018;19(3):243 to 251. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30294782/
  13. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989 to 1002. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
  14. Baggio LL, Drucker DJ. Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(6):2131 to 2157. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17498508/
  15. El Khoudary SR, Aggarwal B, Beckie TM, et al. Menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk: implications for timing of early prevention. Circulation. 2020;142(25):e506, e532. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33251828/
  16. The Menopause Society. 2022 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The Menopause Society. Menopause. 2022;29(7):767 to 794. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35797481/
  17. Bent B, Goldstein BA, Kibbe WA, Dunn JP. Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32047863/
  18. Jouven X, Empana JP, Schwartz PJ, Desnos M, Courbon D, Ducimetière P. Heart-rate profile during exercise as a predictor of sudden death. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(19):1951 to 1958. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa043012
  19. Cobin RH, Goodman NF. Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline: cardiovascular risk in women with endocrine disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(5):1653 to 1668. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29590360/
  20. Garnvik LE, Malmo V, Janszky I, Wisløff U, Loennechen JP,
Free2-min check·
Start assessment