Inside the Olsen Finasteride 5-year Methodology: What Most Summaries Skip
At a glance
- Design / Two 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled trials plus up to four 1-year placebo-controlled extensions [1]
- Enrolled / 1,553 men aged 18 to 41 with male pattern hair loss, mild to moderate in the label description [2][4]
- Continued into extensions / 1,215 men [1]
- Primary measure / Hair count in a 1-inch diameter circle (5.1 cm2) of balding vertex scalp [2]
- Baseline hair count / 876 hairs [2]
- Versus placebo / +107 hairs at year 1, +138 at year 2 (P<0.001) [2]
- Five-year outcome / Durable improvement in scalp hair versus placebo across all endpoints [1]
- Comparator / Placebo only, no minoxidil arm [1][3]
What the five-year study actually was
The program began as two 1-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in 1,553 men aged 18 to 41 with mild to moderate male pattern hair loss [2][4]. Hair count and patient self-assessment were the primary endpoints; investigator assessment and ratings of photographs were secondary [4].
Of the men who completed the first 12 months, 1,215 elected to continue, and the long-term report covers up to four 1-year extensions, five years in total [1]. The second-year extension was double-blind and placebo-controlled [2][4], and the long-term report describes all the extensions as placebo-controlled [1]. That is the structural point most write-ups miss: the placebo arm did not dissolve at month 12, and the long-term comparison is still finasteride against placebo. Men assigned to placebo showed progressive hair loss across the program [1].
How the hair was counted
The numeric endpoint was a hair count inside a 1-inch diameter circular area (5.1 cm2) of balding vertex scalp, starting from a baseline of 876 hairs [2]. Finasteride produced 107 more hairs than placebo at one year and 138 more at two years, P<0.001 [2]. Patient self-assessment, investigator assessment and photograph review moved in the same direction [2].
A single fixed circle is a narrow window. It captures the vertex and nothing else. A third trial in the same development program enrolled 326 men with mild to moderate hair loss in the anterior mid-scalp, with or without vertex balding [4], and the label states that efficacy in bitemporal recession has not been established [4]. The long-term numbers are vertex numbers.
The protocol detail almost no summary mentions
Every man in the trials, whether assigned to finasteride or placebo, was instructed to use a specified medicated tar-based shampoo (Neutrogena T/Gel) during the first two years, to prevent seborrheic dermatitis from confounding the assessment of hair growth [4]. The year 1 and year 2 hair counts were therefore generated under a standardized scalp-care protocol [4].
Dose and timing in the program
The trials used finasteride 1 mg once daily, with or without food [4]. The label says daily use for three months or more is generally necessary before benefit is observed, continued use is recommended to sustain benefit, and withdrawal of treatment leads to reversal of effect within 12 months [4].
No minoxidil arm
Placebo was the only comparator. A 1999 review of finasteride in male pattern hair loss stated that its clinical efficacy had not been compared with topical minoxidil [3]. A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis pooled finasteride 1 mg and 5% minoxidil trials separately, each against placebo, and found both superior to placebo [5]. This program supports no claim that one drug beats the other over five years.
Safety over five years
In the three 12-month controlled trials, drug-related decreased libido was reported by 1.8% on finasteride versus 1.3% on placebo, erectile dysfunction by 1.3% versus 0.7%, and ejaculation disorder by 1.2% versus 0.7%; 3.8% versus 2.1% reported one or more of these (p=0.04), and 1.2% versus 0.9% discontinued for a drug-related sexual event [4]. The incidence of each of these reactions fell to 0.3% or less by the fifth year of treatment [4]. A self-administered sexual function questionnaire at month 12 showed statistically significant differences in favor of placebo in three of four domains (sexual interest, erections, and perception of sexual problems), with no significant difference in overall satisfaction with sex life [4].
The long-term report concluded that finasteride was generally well tolerated and that no new safety concerns emerged over five years [1]. Set against that, safety reporting across finasteride hair-loss trials has a known weakness. A 2015 meta-analysis of 34 trials found that none had adequate safety reporting, 76% evaluated safety for one year or less, and funnel plots suggested systematic under-detection of sexual adverse effects; only 31% of 5,704 men treated in practice would have met the entry criteria of the pivotal trials [6]. A 2019 meta-analysis of 15 randomized placebo-controlled trials (4,495 men) put the relative risk of sexual dysfunction at 1.66 with finasteride 1 mg (95% CI 1.20 to 2.30) [7].
The current Propecia label also lists, as postmarketing reports, sexual dysfunction that continued after discontinuation (erectile dysfunction, libido disorders, ejaculation disorders, orgasm disorders) plus male infertility and poor seminal quality, with the caveat that these voluntary reports come from a population of uncertain size and a causal relationship cannot reliably be established [4][8].
What five years of data does not settle
The report covers five years and does not describe follow-up beyond that [1]. It counts vertex hair, and the label's statement on bitemporal recession is a limitation rather than a result [4]. It also cannot say how often sexual side effects persist after stopping: the label lists persistence as a postmarketing report [4], and the most-cited interview study, 71 men with a mean 28 months of use and mean 40 months of persistence, was post hoc and self-selected and cannot produce a frequency [9].
Bottom line
For men like those enrolled, aged 18 to 41 with mild to moderate vertex loss, finasteride 1 mg daily produced hair counts above placebo at every reported time point through two years, with durable improvement versus placebo at five years, under placebo-controlled conditions and a standardized shampoo protocol [2][1][4]. The caveats are the vertex-only counting window, the absence of a minoxidil arm, and safety reporting across finasteride hair-loss trials that a 2015 meta-analysis judged inadequate [4][3][6]. HealthRX.com offers finasteride 1 mg by prescription.
Frequently asked questions
Was the extension phase open-label?
How many more hairs did finasteride produce?
Did this program include a minoxidil arm?
Why did every participant use a tar-based shampoo?
Do the results cover frontal or temporal recession?
How common were sexual side effects over five years?
References
- Finasteride Male Pattern Hair Loss Study Group. Long-term (5-year) multinational experience with finasteride 1 mg in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. Eur J Dermatol. 2002;12(1):38-49. Long-term (5-year) multinational experience with finasteride 1 mg in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia
- Kaufman KD, Olsen EA, Whiting D, Savin R, DeVillez R, Bergfeld W, et al. Finasteride in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. Finasteride Male Pattern Hair Loss Study Group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(4 Pt 1):578-89. Finasteride in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. Finasteride Male Pattern Hair Loss Study Group
- McClellan KJ, Markham A. Finasteride: a review of its use in male pattern hair loss. Drugs. 1999;57(1):111-26. Finasteride: a review of its use in male pattern hair loss
- U.S. National Library of Medicine, DailyMed. Propecia (finasteride 1 mg) tablets, Organon prescribing information. Propecia (finasteride 1 mg) tablets, Organon label
- Adil A, Godwin M. The effectiveness of treatments for androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(1):136-141.e5. The effectiveness of treatments for androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Belknap SM, Aslam I, Kiguradze T, Temps WH, Yarnold PR, Cashy J, et al. Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials of Finasteride for Androgenic Alopecia: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(6):600-6. Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials of Finasteride for Androgenic Alopecia: A Meta-analysis
- Lee S, Lee YB, Choe SJ, Lee WS. Adverse Sexual Effects of Treatment with Finasteride or Dutasteride for Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(1):12-17. Adverse Sexual Effects of Treatment with Finasteride or Dutasteride for Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Approval letter, Propecia NDA 020788 labeling supplement S-030, 2022. Propecia NDA 020788 supplement S-030 approval letter
- Irwig MS, Kolukula S. Persistent sexual side effects of finasteride for male pattern hair loss. J Sex Med. 2011;8(6):1747-53. Persistent sexual side effects of finasteride for male pattern hair loss